40calFlintlock
36 Cal.
All flintlocks that I have, have traditional square groove rifling. Conducting an engineering experiment (called Design of Experiment [DOE]), I have been able to get excellent groupings on these rifles. Recently, I had a 32 flinter built and it has radius-groove rifling.
Today, I went shooting for the umpth time and, still using the DOE method, I cannot get the rifle to group. I shoot using a bench-rest so the rifle placement is consistent.
To date, I've put in excess of 200 balls down-range. The inputs I used previously, that gave me a .545 inch average group, today barely stayed on a 10X10 target. Other times, what gave me a 6inch spread would give me a 2 inch grouping. The only difference between all the flinters I have, beside caliber, is this one has radius-groove rifling. Is it me, or is the radius-groove rifling the culprit?
Has anyine else experienced similar results? :surrender:
Today, I went shooting for the umpth time and, still using the DOE method, I cannot get the rifle to group. I shoot using a bench-rest so the rifle placement is consistent.
To date, I've put in excess of 200 balls down-range. The inputs I used previously, that gave me a .545 inch average group, today barely stayed on a 10X10 target. Other times, what gave me a 6inch spread would give me a 2 inch grouping. The only difference between all the flinters I have, beside caliber, is this one has radius-groove rifling. Is it me, or is the radius-groove rifling the culprit?
Has anyine else experienced similar results? :surrender: