I'am interested by your opinion...
Lehighs are my favorites. As a student, if not a maker, I have gleened some key points to look for. Please forgive me, as I know it is much easier to be a critic than an artist, but I will take your invitation to give my opinions.
I am certainly not able to do as well, but I have a couple observations: The wrist appears to be taller than it is wide, and this is not how Moll and the other Lehigh (Northampton/Allentown/Bethlehem/Macungie) smiths shaped them (they were noticably wider than tall). Finally, the Lehigh smiths removed so much wood as to be frightening in the slivers that remain. This is what makes them so graceful. A 9 pound rifle looks like a 6 from the side. The dish under the grip rail and trigger bow is cut
higher than the lower profile of the forend (only ever seen on a Lehigh). That's what make the wrist 1/4" wider than it is high. The flats behind the sideplate and lock have very narrow borders on the originals. The good news is that it looks like you reproduced the typical low forearm (more than 1/2 of the barrel is exposed on the side flats). You also got the upper extension properly inset into the comb instead of going full width like the similar Bucks Co. (Even Eric Kettenburg missed this on a couple of his Lehighs).
You do beautiful work. The Lehigh :imo: is about as difficult a style to reproduce as possible. All the curves and lines have to blend properly (I always thought the whole rifle looks like it is flowing in every direction from the front of the trigger bow.
As I said. It is my favorite, so I am a little fussy about every little detail. I wish I had the talent to create such works.