Okay but remember if you go percussion you'll be post 35 (some will claim post-1840) but if you go flint it will run the entire time range you stated.7tharkinf said:I think I lean more toward the longer rifles the Kentucky or Pennsylvania style.
I have used percussion for 25 years (Civil War) but my main love has always been the colonial period. Never built a longarm but picked one up for Christmas to build at long last. Freaked me out at first when I saw how much work has to be done but eventually I got over the initial shock and am slowly proceeding with it.7tharkinf said:Well I want to be historically accurate as possible im not a gun builder by any means. I know that you get what you pay for but I don't want to get really deep into it. I wouldn't mind trying a flintlock just never have used one and don't know much about them. but also this will be my main hunting rifle I only hunt blackpowder I gave up modern weapons long ago.
Yes I know but "erring on the side of caution" as there are those who have argued that percussion wasn't readily available out west until after 1840. Despite the fact that Forsyth allowed his percussion patent to lapse in 1822 and many (if not most) manufacturers started producing percussion firearms almost immediately.Luke MacGillie said:thinking that Percussion is a 1840 or even 1850 thing is kinda wrong. The Colt Paterson came to market in 1836, it was percussion. Nathaniel Wyeth was converting rifles to Percussion at Rendevous prior to 1837.
"In 1838 Adolphus Meir & Company of St. Louis was advertising "1 000 000 S&B [percussion] caps in small boxes".""Gunsmoke and saddle leather: firearms in the nineteenth-century American West" by Charles G. Worman
Enter your email address to join: