I looked around and did a search, couldn't find this vid on here or see other mention. Sorry if someone else did and I missed it. If it does happen this year, then. Yay. 11:18 minute mark.
Haven’t seen any images as yet, but it will be a percussion from what I’ve read.Are there images available yet for this gun? Will it be flintlock or percussion?
Has there been any discussion on what calibers the Hawken might be offered in? A 58 would be great in my opinion.
Have to keep an eye on his website and YT channel. It was roughly mid-year when he started dropping hints and eventually making mentions in videos about the fowler. He may handle this one differently though whereas the forum is concerned. The guy gets a lot of unnecessary flak on here for some reason.Are there images available yet for this gun? Will it be flintlock or percussion?
I looked around and did a search, couldn't find this vid on here or see other mention. Sorry if someone else did and I missed it. If it does happen this year, then. Yay. 11:18 minute mark.
That would be awesome!Has there been any discussion on what calibers the Hawken might be offered in? A 58 would be great in my opinion.
He'll probably offer a choice, like he does with his current stockings....Has there been any discussion on what calibers the Hawken might be offered in? A 58 would be great in my opinion.
Yes, I agree 100% on the 62 cal rifle. I am sure he will offer in various stages of maple, walnut and cherry, and odd woods as they come in like all the rest.I'm in agreement on the 58 but it would take a 62 for me to hit the submit button.
Wonder if walnut or maple?
Don't fret about it being a 58, much less a 62. Jim's rifle will be of a caliberI am interested to learn mire about this!
Why a .62 caliber? I thought that the originals came in a range of calibers but most were in the .50-54 range. Is there a specific example in this size that makes it more desirable than a .54? Or is it just because this would be the lightest version? Thanks in advance for your responses!
Don't fret about it being a .62 or even a .58. It will be of the caliber(s) most prevalent during the originals.I am interested to learn mire about this!
Why a .62 caliber? I thought that the originals came in a range of calibers but most were in the .50-54 range. Is there a specific example in this size that makes it more desirable than a .54? Or is it just because this would be the lightest version? Thanks in advance for your responses!
There are specific examples of calibers larger than 54 including 62. They seem to show up later in RM fur trade period (which "officially" ended in about 1840 but seems to have thrived throughout the '40's). But for me that would not be a determining factor. I'd be interested in the additional punch for elk and moose size game.I am interested to learn mire about this!
Why a .62 caliber? I thought that the originals came in a range of calibers but most were in the .50-54 range. Is there a specific example in this size that makes it more desirable than a .54? Or is it just because this would be the lightest version? Thanks in advance for your responses!