ACttually, Claude, Pletch's video is too dark to see much of anything. If you have a still shot of the action you can see a slight blur of the edge of the flint, and the back of the flint which represents the action of the leather " giving " like a shock absorber. Its more like a double Tap, with a fast semi-auto handgun, than a easily seen " Bounce ", I have used the term" Bounce " because it accurately describes what actually happens.
I know you are sceptical, but it is happening. If you look at the small size of the bits of steel clogging the edge of the flint, you will realize just how small the movement is that tears steel out of that hardened frizzen, and leaves them stuck in the flint edge. If it were easy to see, everyone would have seen it, and we would not behaving this diagreement.
So you don't acribe any mystical powers to me, let me assure you that I did not see the " bounce" either, and wasn't looking for it, until my late friend, Don Latter, who grew up fiddling with flintlocks and taught himself how to tune locks before I came into the picture, showed it to me. Even then, the better visible evidence was the before and after examination of the edge of the flint, first wrapped in his old leather wrap, well worn, and dried, and flattened, and then when wrapped in a thin wrap of lead. We used the same flint with both wraps, so that only the wraps were different. We used magnifying lens to examine the edge of the flint, in strong sunlight, just so we would not miss anything.
I had never seen a flint fired a couple of times with a leather wrap- what everyone was using- that did not have metal bits in the edge. Changing to lead was the first time I didn't see metal. We continued to shoot that particular flint, and re-examined it every 5 shots or so, throughout the day. Because the angle of the flint to frizzen was correct, and the flint scraped metal off, while self knapping, we found no bits of metal in the edge after firing an additional 20 rds. Don kept track of that particular flint, and got more than 140 strikes out of it before it was too short to hold in the jaws of his cock.
To explain what was difficult to see, we then experimented with flint and steel kits to see what kind of action was needed to get lots of sparks that were white hot in color. Then we asked how could the same flint cut different color sparks when the only thing changed was the flint wrap?
Don figured it out one after noon, when someone gave him some scraps of tanned leather, that was fairly thick. For the heck of it, he cut a small strip, and used it to make a new leather wrap for his flint. When he put it in the jaws, and tightened down, the few sparks that were created were barely orange, and died as soon as they struck the pan- no bouncing sparks off the pan. That was worse performance than his dried out, old used leather wrap, so he put that leather wrap back on the flint, and the flint threw more sparks, orange, but at least they were hot enough to bounce off the pan. He got excited, and tried raw hide, some Parfletch scraps he had, tanned leather again, of different thicknesses, from several different animal sources. The thicker the leather wraps were, the few and colder the sparks they threw. But nothing threw three the shower of white hot sparks, that bounced twice in the pan before burning out, that the lead wrap produced. And, the bits of steel left in the flint edge were proportionate bigger in relation to the thickness of the leather used as a wrap.
The only way to explain what we were able to see, is what we eventually did see in a still photo taken with the aperature left open long enough to record the full movement of the cock, and the life of the sparks. It became very clear that what we saw with our eyes was real- fewer sparks, orange to dull orange in color using leather; a shower of sparks white in color using lead. And, using a manifying glass, you could see the slight blur of the edge as it rebounds off the frizzen. I am sure that this occurs in millionths of a second, so only very expensive time-lapse photography equipment would be able to catch it on film, and slow it down so we can see it. I don't have access to that kind of equipment.