• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

My Flintlock:Indian style

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Bowjo

32 Cal.
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
109_0009.jpg

109_0010.jpg

109_0011.jpg
 
I shot it today and finaly got a group going.The sights are very crude and hard for me to see.I ended up shooting 70 grns 2f,priming with 4f and a .440 ball.This was my first try with a flintlock.Took a little getting used too.I had drilled my touchhole to 5/64.I stuck a feather in touchhole when priming.Shot about 20 times no problems.....Joe
 
When I bought my Bess Carbine it had brass tacks in the stock and I thought that it looked good. When I shot it I found that my beard got caught in the tacks and the recoil pulled out individual hairs :cursing: . The tacks came out immediately. Your experience may vary.

Many Klatch
 
Many Klatch said:
When I bought my Bess Carbine it had brass tacks in the stock and I thought that it looked good. When I shot it I found that my beard got caught in the tacks and the recoil pulled out individual hairs :cursing: . The tacks came out immediately. Your experience may vary.

Many Klatch

Have you tried shaving? :rotf:
 
No need to shave, the tacks will only pull the hairs that are in the way. You never know, you might start a new style. :hmm:
 
Jack Wilson said:
Nice job, but it looks like a 1770's gun with 1870's decorations. IMO

I'm curious. Just what is it about this rifle that looks vintage 1770's to you?

Maybe 1970's vintage???

Thanks, J.D.
 
jdkerstetter said:
Jack Wilson said:
Nice job, but it looks like a 1770's gun with 1870's decorations. IMO

I'm curious. Just what is it about this rifle that looks vintage 1770's to you?

Maybe 1970's vintage???
Don't get your panties in an Historically Accurate bunch. I just meant a flintlock being 1700's GENERALLY speaking. I think we all know it's a repro.

I'm not saying the Natives didn't decorate their "stuff" since time began, I'm just saying it looks like a later period. His decorations reminded me of the stuff the Indians did in the 1800's.

Here's a real one: This rifle was owned by White Man Runs Him, one of Custer’s scouts at the Battle of Little Big Horn.

6124_2.jpg


Hey, if he likes it, who cares? It's just an opinion, not cause to debate the Historical Accuracy of an off-hand comment. Lighten up.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top