PA Conical vs 54 RB Advice

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
That's one I can't answer. I just went out and mic'ed the diameter of the Minie's ....but they are prepped for shooting. I bump them out to a diameter of .550 plus or minus a few thousands.

I do know that without bumping the base the Minie will drop to the bottom of my .54 barrel with practically no resistance. So, if you know the diameter of the lands, that will tell you something.
I'm going to attempt to memory hole your method. Wish me luck.
 
I have a Santa Fe Hawken with the .53 cal bore and have wondered if there was a possibility of finding a conical that would load and shoot well from it.
My barrels twist is 1:66 I believe, and I have measured the groove to groove diameter at .533", or maybe that was the land to land diameter... I'll have to double check that.
One more question for @ChuckJonesWagon, do you know the diameter of the as cast Lyman 533-476 before expanding the base?
Regards
Take a look at Tom’s website Accurate Molds dot com. He can modify .54 caliber designs to fit your bore.
 
Huh? Since when?


Regardless, I’m sure Accurate Molds can provide a short .53 caliber mold suitable for @kelvinator’s Santa Fe Hawken.

Maybe something like this one.
View attachment 367935
That looks very interesting and I thank you for the link.
I slugged the bore on my SF Hawken and have a bore of .532" with rifling depth of .010" for a total groove to groove of .552"
 
I have killed several deer with PA .50 conicals out of two different 1/48 Hawkens. They are killers and exit. If they shoot well in your 1/60 I wouldn't hesitate to use them. From the wound channels, they seem to expand well too. Good luck. SW
 
That looks very interesting and I thank you for the link.
I slugged the bore on my SF Hawken and have a bore of .532" with rifling depth of .010" for a total groove to groove of .552"
If it was me I might find something like this 370 grain bullet, (https://muzzleloader-bullets.com/product/54-caliber/ ) size them to .531” and see how they fly. I suspect you’d need a stout charge 90 grains or more and I’d suggest an oversized card or wool wad under the bullet. Probably wouldn’t remain stable for really long range but it might prove the concept before you drop a hundred fifty bucks on a mold.
IMG_5495.jpeg
 
If it was me I might find something like this 370 grain bullet, (https://muzzleloader-bullets.com/product/54-caliber/ ) size them to .531” and see how they fly. I suspect you’d need a stout charge 90 grains or more and I’d suggest an oversized card or wool wad under the bullet. Probably wouldn’t remain stable for really long range but it might prove the concept before you drop a hundred fifty bucks on a mold.View attachment 368320
If this bullet has a solid, flat base as opposed to a hollow expanding base, then I’d suspect it won’t be consistently accurate.

Just my experience from shooting flat base Lee Real Bullets vs the hollow base Minie.
 
If this bullet has a solid, flat base as opposed to a hollow expanding base, then I’d suspect it won’t be consistently accurate.

Just my experience from shooting flat base Lee Real Bullets vs the hollow base Minie.
I shoot almost nothing but flat base bullets from various calibers from .40 to .54 and have had no trouble attaining consistent accuracy for hunting or targets. I do shoot one .40 caliber hollow based paper patched bullet and it’s a great little antelope or target bullet.
 
I shoot almost nothing but flat base bullets from various calibers from .40 to .54 and have had no trouble attaining consistent accuracy for hunting or targets. I do shoot one .40 caliber hollow based paper patched bullet and it’s a great little antelope or target bullet.
I should have qualified my response as all barrels like what they like. Powder type/charge, lube, etc all make a difference. As does bullet weight and style, and BH.

My opinion was based on just the Lee Real.
 
I just haven’t found any conicals for 1:60 twist for 54. I don’t want to get into casting my own at this time
You won't likely find conicals for 1:60 twist as they need a faster twist. 1:48 seems to be the most popular made twist for a CONICAL / RB compromise. Might i suggest looking for a used 54 or 50 Lyman GP Hunter? It's faster twist 1:32 (?) is much better for conicals and you can forget about trying to work out a rb/patch/bp combo that works. I bought a T./C 54 Maxi ball mold and cast up a lifetime supply then sold everything. My GPH shoots Maxis very well and you have plenty of knockdown for an elk which is why I orig bought mine. Deer don't mind at all but for pronghorn I would probably go 50.
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top