- Joined
- Jul 12, 2019
- Messages
- 600
- Reaction score
- 687
Wad, not was.
Yes I have heard that about the Bess, being a better suitor to shoot shot. I believe 11BangBang on Youtube made a video on that as well.FWIW I am also going back and forth on he 1777 vs the Bess and am leaning Bess as the virtual 12 gauge (I think?) bore size, makes sourcing ball, wads etc easier.
Why? They are safe, and reliable, and the consensus is the Pedersolis aren't historically accurate either, so why pay $1000 extra?
If you had to make the choice of the Indian gun pr nothing, what would it be?
I am as well. But for me, it comes down to saying I have a Brown Bess, vs just having a fowling piece. Not taking anything away from Jim. But I like the idea of owning a replica Brown Bess. Albeit it's not 100% accurate, its close enough for me.I'm surprised no one has said get a Kibler fowler...
With all due respect, I’ve found the Indian guns to be anything but reliable. I’ve got first-hand experience, and a fair amount of tweaking is typically equired to have a firearm that functions as it should.Why? They are safe, and reliable, and the consensus is the Pedersolis aren't historically accurate either, so why pay $1000 extra?
If you had to make the choice of the Indian gun pr nothing, what would it be?
Yeah it's tough to say. A grand these days is two months of car payments for the average American, so I reckon some folks gotta figure out what's more important. Freedom to spend money, or their awesome jacked up F150 that nobody cares about
I have the mindset of you get what you pay for, so if it's got a $900 price tag on it vs a $1600 price tag. I'll probably take the latter. I don't mean any offense with this comment by the way.
But is "head and shoulders" equal to over a thousand dollars and over twice the price?With all due respect, I’ve found the Indian guns to be anything but reliable. I’ve got first-hand experience, and a fair amount of tweaking is typically equired to have a firearm that functions as it should.
Pedersoli quality -though not perfect- is head and shoulders above the Indian-made guns. Period.
You may be asking the wrong guy, but I’d have to respond with a resounding “Yes”!But is "head and shoulders" equal to over a thousand dollars and over twice the price?
Especially for something you plan to tote through the woods, use in reenactments stacked in camp and lay around in a hunting blind?
That is a good point, but the fact you could buy three of the Indian Muskets for the price of one Pedersoli. means the Pedersoli would have to last three times as long to break even.The issue with Indian guns isn’t necessarily safety, it’s longevity of the the lock components. The durability of the springs and mating surfaces is of concern. Additionally, the guns are nearly all made with non-interchangeable parts that were fitted to each piece. When a part wears out, good luck finding a new one. With a Pedersoli, a quick email and you’ll have a new one on its way and will be a drop in replacement fit.
Which model of Indian musket did you own and from which distributor? What problems did you have with it other than general appearance?You may be asking the wrong guy, but I’d have to respond with a resounding “Yes”!
As someone who’s had the opportunity to own both and compare, I feel as though I’m sufficiently qualified to make that assertion.
Thank you! I do load a patch (.010-015 pillow ticking lubed with buffalo tallow), but it’s not absolutely necessary. That’s the thing about smoothbores: everything is permissible but not everything is beneficial.That thing is Purdy! Do you load a patch down with that .735 ball?
Couldn’t have said it better myself!You’re absolutely right about the “you get what you pay for” bit. Early on in my muzzleloading journey, I purchased some cheaper guns because I was impatient and didn’t want to have to wait and save my pennies for something that was better quality. In the end, I had to spend a substantial amount of money getting those cheaper firearms to function as they should. They often had issues like bad lock geometry, inadequately hardened frizzens, and poor inletting.
Buy once, cry once.
Good to know! When the time comes I’ll have to look into this patch and ball combo.Thank you! I do load a patch (.010-015 pillow ticking lubed with buffalo tallow), but it’s not absolutely necessary. That’s the thing about smoothbores: everything is permissible but not everything is beneficial.
What made you go with the carbine model? Any reason, or just want?Get the Pedersoli Brown Bess, or a kit from Dixie Gun Works. you cant go wrong.
I built my Bess Carbine from a Pederdoli kit, from Dixie.
Dave
Why? They are safe, and reliable, and the consensus is the Pedersolis aren't historically accurate either, so why pay $1000 extra?
If you had to make the choice of the Indian gun pr nothing, what would it be?
The Pedersoli Bess is not an accurate replica of a Bess. dave_person has discussed the shortcomings in great detail.Dixie is a bit cheaper at the moment, than muzzle-loaders.com
I say I'm not too picky on the historical background on it, but here I am kind of about to eat my own words. I like the Bess specifically because of its history, and its time in the Colonies and the whole romanticized history of it is a huge selling point. As far as fowlers, and trade guns are concerned, eh not as exciting to me lol.
Enter your email address to join: