I know the progressive rifling of PH 1858s and 1853s differences vs other repos...but is there any big reasons for a PH over a modern Pedersoli repro Whitworth? Other than new Pedersoli's are readily available?
TIA,
Brian
TIA,
Brian
Pedersoli vs Parker Hale Whitworth
- Thread starter m4fun
- Start date
Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2005
- Messages
- 7,121
- Reaction score
- 5,420
I can do no more to convince you than ask you to watch Brett Gibbons' latest YouTube post - a tale of two Whitworths....I've included my preamble from the Whitworth Collectors' page of FB - yesterday, coincidentally, was Sir Joseph's birthday. I bought my first P-H Whitworth [#888] in 1986, and second ]#420] in 2022.
'Happy Birthday, Sir Joseph! And to celebrate the event, here's Brett's latest YT production with a debut of a 1980-made Parker-Hale Whitworth, the very first shots EVER from this iconic rifle, showing clearly why they are so valued by the cognoscenti - that is to say, us poor folks who can't quite step up to the heady finances of a genuine article. Brett is shooting his EuroArms with less success, but with just as much fun, no doubt.'
Please note that the hexagonal Whitworth rofling is NOT progressive. The bullet, if a hexagon, is a fit for the rifling with a turn of, I bleeve, 1:20, and makes a perfect fit on firing. A cylindrical bullet like the multi-groove Lyman, turns into a hexagon with the help of between 70 and 90gr of 3Fg. Both shapes work perfectly well. You can clearly see the six-sided holes in this target, shot with my original rifle many moons ago -
This is the first ten shots with #420, last year. Again, the bullets were round and the holes are hexagonal....
and here is the rifle...
'Happy Birthday, Sir Joseph! And to celebrate the event, here's Brett's latest YT production with a debut of a 1980-made Parker-Hale Whitworth, the very first shots EVER from this iconic rifle, showing clearly why they are so valued by the cognoscenti - that is to say, us poor folks who can't quite step up to the heady finances of a genuine article. Brett is shooting his EuroArms with less success, but with just as much fun, no doubt.'
Please note that the hexagonal Whitworth rofling is NOT progressive. The bullet, if a hexagon, is a fit for the rifling with a turn of, I bleeve, 1:20, and makes a perfect fit on firing. A cylindrical bullet like the multi-groove Lyman, turns into a hexagon with the help of between 70 and 90gr of 3Fg. Both shapes work perfectly well. You can clearly see the six-sided holes in this target, shot with my original rifle many moons ago -
This is the first ten shots with #420, last year. Again, the bullets were round and the holes are hexagonal....
and here is the rifle...
Last edited:
Absolutely, Happy Birthday, Sir Joseph!
I got to meet Brett on a weekend getaway with my wife a couple of months ago in Gettysberg the weekend he got back from being deployed. I bought the Destroying Angel from him, and he even gave a few of his Pritchetts for the Enfield. A major seed was planted there. Thanks to a couple of folks here, I have started down that path of the 1853/1858s.
Next adventure will be saving for a Whitworth! Other than saving $$$ want to get to be as knowledgeable as I can get but also ensure the Pedersoli is inline with the PHs which are a bit harder to find...
Looks like Parker Hale wins that round!
I got to meet Brett on a weekend getaway with my wife a couple of months ago in Gettysberg the weekend he got back from being deployed. I bought the Destroying Angel from him, and he even gave a few of his Pritchetts for the Enfield. A major seed was planted there. Thanks to a couple of folks here, I have started down that path of the 1853/1858s.
Next adventure will be saving for a Whitworth! Other than saving $$$ want to get to be as knowledgeable as I can get but also ensure the Pedersoli is inline with the PHs which are a bit harder to find...
Looks like Parker Hale wins that round!
