user 36911
50 Cal.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2020
- Messages
- 1,146
- Reaction score
- 1,027
Its been said around, that your first one may not be a flinter, but your last one will be.
Not for me it won't.
Its been said around, that your first one may not be a flinter, but your last one will be.
I consider it over at the last rendezvous and that was 1840. It doesn't have to be at it's peak to consider it still going. Besides i'm not just into what they did during beaver trapping but what they did when it was over too.
So percussion guns didn’t show up on the scene until the bitter end of the “mountain man” era.
It's my understanding that folks near the settlements would have progressed to the Percussion system as caps would have been readily available. The Frontier however, was a different story. If you ran out of caps there, your gun became a club.
Not really. It went to 1840. The whole thing wasn't that long.
The point is, mountain men used the Hawken and it's PC to use one.
But with figures like John Johnston, Kit Carson, Jim Bridger, Hugh Glass and Theodore Roosevelt just to name a few of the men of the west who carried Hawken rifles I think it’s safe to say those that could afford them did.I would hazard a guess that they would have used a Trade Gun as they weren't as expensive. I also read some where that the Hawken Brothers only made something like 450 guns. I'm sure there were more Trappers than that.
Nobody is claiming that every trapper had a Hawken. How many would have to own one for it to be PC? Just one works for me but i'm sure it was way more than that.I would hazard a guess that they would have used a Trade Gun as they weren't as expensive. I also read some where that the Hawken Brothers only made something like 450 guns. I'm sure there were more Trappers than that.
I think the American Long Rifle was used by a lot more mountain men than the Trade gun for its range and accuracy. Plus if Hawken made 100 rifles in 1850 alone I think they may have made more than 450.I would hazard a guess that they would have used a Trade Gun as they weren't as expensive. I also read some where that the Hawken Brothers only made something like 450 guns. I'm sure there were more Trappers than that.
My persona is a hunter for a brigade and after the fur trade era it would be a hunter for a fort. So, my gun wouldn't be just for protection like most trappers but a tool I made money with. I would have scraped up the $25 to buy a Hawken.The last rendezvous was in 1840, and the beaver fur trade started dying off pretty quickly around the same time. There were a lot of Hawkens made long after 1840. And, not many mountain men carried a Hawken, because it was a PREMIUM gun with a price to match. I would guess that ALL mountain men wanted a Hawken, but my estimate is that only 10-15% of them actually ever owned one, at ANY time in their lives, which would include long after age kept them from ever returning to the mountains.
Not for me it won't.
I don't have anything against flintlocks. I've had them and they were fun to hunt. However, the gun I like the most and use is the half stock Hawken. There never was a half stock Hawken flintlock. Only the full stock had a flintlock. So, I have no choice but to use a caplock if I want to be PC.Oh Pashaw!
Come to the darkside... We have cookies!
Yes, but i've been saying it for years in front of Hawken experts and nobody has ever produced even a picture of one. Let alone a gun.I don't like heavy Hawken's . But I made two for patrons who did , One bog standard cap the other half stock flint . I have Biards books but I would,nt say boldly" There where No such gun "or any such bold statement (Not that I overly care ) .Because as soon as you state " There was no this or that" in the study of guns . Sure as eggs is eggs One will pop up to confound you . I only write this not to claim anything about Hawken,s it would be as true of any antigue ever made . That why real experts call them selves '.Students of arms. ect '. I know some I don't claim to be one the student bit yes not the expert bit .
Rudyard
You clearly are a Hawken devotee Far be it that I should question your findings. In general Ide say I had a point but in this particular I must except your findings .Yes, but i've been saying it for years in front of Hawken experts and nobody has ever produced even a picture of one. Let alone a gun.
It's too bad too. I'd prefer to use a flintlock. However, i'd hear that little voice in my head say i'm using a gun that never existed. I wish that voice would shut up sometimes.You clearly are a Hawken devotee Far be it that I should question your findings. In general Ide say I had a point but in this particular I must except your findings .
Regards Rudyard
Enter your email address to join: