I understand your concern about the prevalent use of certain terminologies and the importance of historical accuracy. It’s true that terms like “shot pouch” and “hunting pouch” were commonly used historically to describe bags that carried shooting supplies; however, language evolves over time, and the meanings and common usages of terms can shift. We can’t simply choose to ignore this very real fact. While it’s important to acknowledge and understand historical terminology, it’s also essential to recognize that contemporary usage may differ. In modern contexts, “possibles bag” has become a widely accepted term— one that has been adopted by the vast majority of the muzzleloading community, in my experience.
Promoting historical accuracy is valuable, but it’s also important to consider the evolution of language and how terms are understood by contemporary audiences. Educating others about the historical origins of these terms can provide valuable context, but insisting on the exclusive use of historical terminology may not always be practical or effective, especially when the modern term is widely recognized and understood.
In summary, while “shot pouch” and “hunting pouch” may be more historically accurate, the term “possibles bag” has evolved to have its own meaning and recognition in modern times. Acknowledging both the historical and contemporary usages allows for a more comprehensive understanding and appreciation of the subject.
In any case, we’ve kind of hijacked the thread here. Perhaps we ought to take this discussion elsewhere.
