new to this forum and i hope some of you guys can help! i am looking to make a primitive flintlock pistol. it will not be a weapon crafted by a professional gunmaker but a poor farmer/settler on the appalachian frontier circa 1790-1807. the architect of the stock as a result will be very crude in appearance.
since the farmer was not that skilled and to make it appear as crudely made as possible, i am considering using sheet metal brass or rawhide around the barrel on the forestock instead of securing it with pins. do any of you have knowledge of this being done on early weapons?
if the above is feasible what would be the easiest to use--rawhide or sheet brass?
also,have any of you ever seen early pistols without ramrod channels? i have seen one ex. in a book. history states that the ramrod was carried around the neck on a laynard instead of in the channel itself.
again, this will be a very crude pistol made by someone without gunmaking skills. i just thought these two construction ideas for making the weapon would help in giving the appearance i am after. also, would love to know from those of you who know more than i if you think this historically correct
since the farmer was not that skilled and to make it appear as crudely made as possible, i am considering using sheet metal brass or rawhide around the barrel on the forestock instead of securing it with pins. do any of you have knowledge of this being done on early weapons?
if the above is feasible what would be the easiest to use--rawhide or sheet brass?
also,have any of you ever seen early pistols without ramrod channels? i have seen one ex. in a book. history states that the ramrod was carried around the neck on a laynard instead of in the channel itself.
again, this will be a very crude pistol made by someone without gunmaking skills. i just thought these two construction ideas for making the weapon would help in giving the appearance i am after. also, would love to know from those of you who know more than i if you think this historically correct