Kentuckywindage said:
IMO if cost meant anything to us, we'd shoot smokeless centerfires because the ammo is much cheaper.
The powder i shoot out of my smokepole of expensive but damn well worth it! Capper knows what that stuff is i shoot :blah:
Wait... how do you get that shooting a muzzleloader is expensive?
If you buy everything:
Hornady round ball: $13/100
Powder: We'll say $30/lb, for the sake of argument.
Caps: $7/100, again, for the sake of argument.
So, one shot from a .50 is
70gns powder = 30 cents
1 round ball = 13 cents
1 cap = 7 cents
Total per shot = 50 cents.
Now, for me, my expenses are thus:
70gns black powder (2Fg Goex) = 20 cents
1 round ball = negligible, couple cents; cast them myself.
Cap = 6 cents (I did some bargain hunting and got to be friends with store owners).
I cut your cost about in half.
I'm not including the cost of patches or lube as I make my own and the cost is likewise to the ball negligible. I do not know how much ya'll pay for prelubed patches.
Now, 100 rounds of CCI Mini-Mag rimfire cost about $7 last I looked. That puts the cost per shot at 7 cents. However, in two minutes with my target rifle/squirrel sniper, I burn through five. This is slow, but necessary when waiting for the right shots.
So, in two minutes' slow fire with a .22, I burn 35 cents. In that same amount of time, I can properly load, aim, and fire a muzzleloader, at about a quarter per shot.
I'm actually saving 10 cents every two minutes using a muzzleloader over a .22 Long Rifle!
Now, the cheapest surplus ammo I've seen was $5/20 for 7.62x54r. That's 25 cents apiece. In a Mosin-Nagant rifle, I can burn through five well-sighted rounds in a minute. That's $2.50 every two minutes.
From my perspective, a muzzleloader is the least expensive to shoot. :thumbsup:
Josh
P.S. Please forgive the modern rifle references. I felt they were necessary to mention to illustrate cost per shot-time compared to a sidelock muzzleloader, which is the basis of my argument. J.S.