.
. may 11 / 06:40
i've reached my wits end.. some say the 3rd time's the charm, but i'm now faced with the 4th and can't make a solid decision, so i need some second opinions.
friday i was at the range with "ol moses" - my latest lemat.. somewhere after 50 or so rounds i noticed that parts of the hammer had actually broken off.. if you're familiar with this navy model, the drop down attachment is flanked by two thin extensions that smooth out the sharp edges of the area on either side of the V sight cut into the hammer attachment.. :shocked2:
i've had this one for just 6 months and its been to the range twice.. a replacement hammer is close to $175..
assuming it's still under dixie's warranty, would you think i should go through the hassle of getting a replacement or just live with it.. :idunno:
here's some more to add to the quandry:
1) the first one (from cabela) also broke after 500+ rounds / 11 months. (returned for refund)
2) the second one (from dixie) was so badly constructed that it was just sent back - no questions asked - and replaced with this 3rd one.
3) on this 3rd one, there is almost zero space between the cylinder and barrel which leads to frequent binding after 1 or 2 full firings of the main cylinder's 9 rounds.. one chamber is just slightly too large and allows 'ball creep' which means i have to stop and fix this .. and there are other annoying little cosmetic things like the front sight being off center and too tall, the trigger guard is slightly out of round (but fits somehow), etc.
so, am i beating my head on the proverbial brick wall just to make good on my original investment or have i become blinded to the reality that these are just shoddy, overpriced novelties meant to be used by reenactors or collectors..
in all honesty, i still think it's a blast to use at the range and never tire of the questions and attention it draws from curious potential new members interested in blackpowder, yet i dread the thought of going through a possible 1-2 months backlog wait only to get yet another lemon that i'll have to dissect and inspect for any number of possible flaws.....
pietta really has done a terrible job with these when it comes to quality control and workmanship.. every one i've owned has had several points where they should have failed inspection but didn't... at this price, that's unbelievable.. are '51 navies or walkers or remingtons any better ?
so, would you return this or just face the fact that they will all have something wrong with 'em and live with it ? :hmm:
~d~
. may 11 / 06:40
i've reached my wits end.. some say the 3rd time's the charm, but i'm now faced with the 4th and can't make a solid decision, so i need some second opinions.
friday i was at the range with "ol moses" - my latest lemat.. somewhere after 50 or so rounds i noticed that parts of the hammer had actually broken off.. if you're familiar with this navy model, the drop down attachment is flanked by two thin extensions that smooth out the sharp edges of the area on either side of the V sight cut into the hammer attachment.. :shocked2:
i've had this one for just 6 months and its been to the range twice.. a replacement hammer is close to $175..
assuming it's still under dixie's warranty, would you think i should go through the hassle of getting a replacement or just live with it.. :idunno:
here's some more to add to the quandry:
1) the first one (from cabela) also broke after 500+ rounds / 11 months. (returned for refund)
2) the second one (from dixie) was so badly constructed that it was just sent back - no questions asked - and replaced with this 3rd one.
3) on this 3rd one, there is almost zero space between the cylinder and barrel which leads to frequent binding after 1 or 2 full firings of the main cylinder's 9 rounds.. one chamber is just slightly too large and allows 'ball creep' which means i have to stop and fix this .. and there are other annoying little cosmetic things like the front sight being off center and too tall, the trigger guard is slightly out of round (but fits somehow), etc.
so, am i beating my head on the proverbial brick wall just to make good on my original investment or have i become blinded to the reality that these are just shoddy, overpriced novelties meant to be used by reenactors or collectors..
in all honesty, i still think it's a blast to use at the range and never tire of the questions and attention it draws from curious potential new members interested in blackpowder, yet i dread the thought of going through a possible 1-2 months backlog wait only to get yet another lemon that i'll have to dissect and inspect for any number of possible flaws.....
pietta really has done a terrible job with these when it comes to quality control and workmanship.. every one i've owned has had several points where they should have failed inspection but didn't... at this price, that's unbelievable.. are '51 navies or walkers or remingtons any better ?
so, would you return this or just face the fact that they will all have something wrong with 'em and live with it ? :hmm:
~d~