I had just a short amount of time yesterday and needed to check the functionality of an unmentionable. Figuring that might only take a minute, I grabbed a new-to-me TC Hawken in .50 cal and my range bag.
After finishing the first task, I dropped 80 grains of Goex FF down the barrel and grabbed a strip of dry-lubed (Dutch Schoulz recipe) patches and a .491 ball and tried to short start it. The barrel would have none of it. My best recollection is this ticking was .018 or a touch over. So, I popped the ball back out and looked around to see what else I had. Nothing. Except a dirty t-shirt used for cleaning.
Not wanting to leave without shooting, I sprayed the t-shirt with some moose milk, doubled it, started the ball, and cut at the muzzle. Ball rammed down snugly and smoothly.
At 25 yards, I easily hit the six inch blob of spray paint on my target, pretty much in the middle.
Pleasantly surprised at this impromptu set-up, I backed up to 50 yards and repeated. Same result, but a little closer to the middle. Not bad!
With just a few minutes left, I backed up to 100 yards (verified via range finder; I was shooting in a field off the back of my truck), and wondered if my luck would hold out.
It didn't. This shot was 14-18 inches low...still in center line but low. I thought that must have been a flier, truck must have shook, foot slipped, or else I just lifted my head at the shot. Whatever, let's try one more.
Same procedure...same result. Holes touching...14 inches low.
I didn't have time to go to 75 for any data, so I left there wondering about the sight. The rear sight is in the lowest position; I didn't move a thing, that is how I received it.
I also got to thinking that when a rifle is sighted in, the projectile will usually cross the line of sight twice: once on the way up just out of muzzle and again as it falls farther down range. I am wondering if the results I saw were the balls hitting the "far 50," if you will, or if I just need to tinker with the sights. Seemed like way too much drop from 50 to 100.
I also suppose the weak patching could have caused the loss of a lot of initial oomph.
What am I overlooking here?
Thank you,
Gary
After finishing the first task, I dropped 80 grains of Goex FF down the barrel and grabbed a strip of dry-lubed (Dutch Schoulz recipe) patches and a .491 ball and tried to short start it. The barrel would have none of it. My best recollection is this ticking was .018 or a touch over. So, I popped the ball back out and looked around to see what else I had. Nothing. Except a dirty t-shirt used for cleaning.
Not wanting to leave without shooting, I sprayed the t-shirt with some moose milk, doubled it, started the ball, and cut at the muzzle. Ball rammed down snugly and smoothly.
At 25 yards, I easily hit the six inch blob of spray paint on my target, pretty much in the middle.
Pleasantly surprised at this impromptu set-up, I backed up to 50 yards and repeated. Same result, but a little closer to the middle. Not bad!
With just a few minutes left, I backed up to 100 yards (verified via range finder; I was shooting in a field off the back of my truck), and wondered if my luck would hold out.
It didn't. This shot was 14-18 inches low...still in center line but low. I thought that must have been a flier, truck must have shook, foot slipped, or else I just lifted my head at the shot. Whatever, let's try one more.
Same procedure...same result. Holes touching...14 inches low.
I didn't have time to go to 75 for any data, so I left there wondering about the sight. The rear sight is in the lowest position; I didn't move a thing, that is how I received it.
I also got to thinking that when a rifle is sighted in, the projectile will usually cross the line of sight twice: once on the way up just out of muzzle and again as it falls farther down range. I am wondering if the results I saw were the balls hitting the "far 50," if you will, or if I just need to tinker with the sights. Seemed like way too much drop from 50 to 100.
I also suppose the weak patching could have caused the loss of a lot of initial oomph.
What am I overlooking here?
Thank you,
Gary