For what it's worth, loading a larger diameter ball into the chamber will greatly increase the length of the cylindrical area formed on the ball.
Using a .452 diameter roundball shoved into a .450 diameter chamber will produce a "flat" cylindrical area that is .0425 long. (about 3/64")
(That's what shearing .0010 per side off of the ball would produce.)
Increasing the ball size to a .454 diameter increases the length of the "flat" cylindrical area to .0601 length. (About 1/16")
(That's what shearing .0020 per side off of the ball would produce.)
A .457 diameter ball shoved into the same .450 diameter chamber will end up with a .0797 long cylindrical area. (about 5/64")
(That's what shearing .0035 per side off of the ball would produce.)
Going to extremes, a .460 diameter ball shoved into the .450 diameter chamber will end up with a .0954 long cylindrical area.
(That's what shearing .0050 per side off of the ball would produce.)
The unanswered question is, "Does this increased length of the cylindrical zone produce better groups?" and, "If it does, is it worth risking the loading lever to get it?".
I think the longer length is useful in producing more surface for the rifling grooves to engage but it's not worth breaking the loading lever to get it.
Maybe that's why the precision target shooters shoot larger, oversize balls but use a simple bench press to load their cylinders?