colorado clyde said:
Obx-Txn said:
My error. That should have read 223.5 to 225.5 or plus or minus 1 grain for the tolerable balls ...
Soooo....How does that translate on the target?
Do you really expect them to all be exactly the same? :shocked2:
I tighten it up a bit more,
My "acceptable" ball are +/- .5 of one grain,, all within a one grain of weight tolerance. It's easy to achieve after learning to cast your own
And Yes,
When translated to target,, they are the same, or I expect them to be the same, more so then those "out of tolerance". And I have proven to myself that those ball out of tolerance are indeed much more prone to being off target then those not within range.
At issue is eliminating variables. The more mechanical variables that are eliminated from the entire shooting regime,, the more each individual can work on the human part of shooting. The mechanics of the gun are all statistical variables that
can be fixed,, just like any tool it should be in it's best possible condition before use.
I've only been casting 4-5 yrs,, maybe more,, but I came to it for the same reason as this topic,, finding Hornandy ball
way out of tolerance.
I went to Speer and at least found them to be round,, then my trust in Speer fell apart as I saw the weights spread.
Trust me, having similar weight, consistent ball improves on target accuracy in a significant manner.
Some people consider cutting X's on a target and hunting accuracy to be different,, I accept that.
But it's not like that for me,
I Hunt,
I shoot target's,
I want to know when I hunt that I will hit the exact spot to the best of my ability that I aim.
X's count beyond the paper target.
The gun is a mechanical tool that I use during and at the end of each "hunt".