Pete Gaimari
69 Cal.
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2010
- Messages
- 3,545
- Reaction score
- 11
That doesn't sound good.
I have a good source for wheel weights. Is that lead ok?
I have a good source for wheel weights. Is that lead ok?
Capper said:Dan Phariss said:Capper said:Interesting experiment.
In the one shot that you can see the ball clearly. The sprue looks to have turned to the side, and it's early in it's flight. Did it continue to turn?
Interesting about the Swiss powder too. Does it get it's powder from a more complete burning than Goex?
Better charcoal.
They use charcoal that is not available in the US.
They also use slightly more potassium nitrate. But mostly its the charcoal.
Dan
I probably worded that wrong. I did study up on Swiss before plunking down my money. I knew about the Alder charcoal and how they process it. Also about the ratio of potassium nitrate. What I wasn't clear on was how that gave it more power. The pictures clearly show how it burns faster and more complete than Goex. I would like to see some pictures of Goex Express to see how it burns.
Capper said:That doesn't sound good.
I have a good source for wheel weights. Is that lead ok?
Capper said:Wouldn't the harder balls from wheel weights be better for target shooting? No concern for expansion.
CrackStock said:I found that when I began casting my own, that I shot a lot more and also took control of the balls that I was shooting. The amount of shooting; the care of loading and the attention to detail in terms of weight and diameter across the balls seemed to increase accuracy.
Whether this improvement was due to increased desire on my part, greater attention to my shooting or an improvement in the projectile would be arguable. The improvement downrange was fact.
I should have written my post better. Wheel weights are fine for target. But, If I am going to hunt, I try to make things as consistant as possible. Wheel weight balls will weigh a little less and will also not shrink as much. if I were to use wheel weights, I would have to change to a thinner patch because my patch/ball combination is as tight as it needs to be.Capper said:Wouldn't the harder balls from wheel weights be better for target shooting? No concern for expansion.
flintlock62 said:Wheel weight balls will weigh a little less and will also not shrink as much.
necchi said:Capper said:Wouldn't the harder balls from wheel weights be better for target shooting? No concern for expansion.
Not really, the soft lead will comform easier to the rifling.
The object of proper patch is too "impart" the rifling to the ball and hence give better controlled spin. Hard lead can "skip" the rifling under heavy charges.
Lead hardness is another constant under endless contention. Top shooters use soft lead.(period), :idunno:
Capper said:Wouldn't the harder balls from wheel weights be better for target shooting? No concern for expansion.
Rogue River said:You will get Approx. 30 balls (.530) per pound of lead! Around here lead go's for $1.00/$1.50 per pound, I would say yes! :hmm:
Separate the stick-on wheel weights from the clip-on ones. The stick-on ones are reported to be quite soft & close to pure lead. The clip-on ones are the higher-alloyed lead.Capper said:My only easy option is wheel weights, because I have a friend here with an auto repair/tire shop.
I live in a town with a pop of 2000. Not a lot of options here.
Enter your email address to join: