This would be a blast to have, cant see firing it many times before shoulder becomes numb lol
Always wanted a blunderbuss
The M79 of the 1700s - Hand Mortar
- Thread starter NeilMacleod
- Start date
Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:
This would be a blast to have, cant see firing it many times before shoulder becomes numb lol
Always wanted a blunderbuss
Youngblood
40 Cal
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2022
- Messages
- 301
- Reaction score
- 362
Yeah those are cool. Tennis balls will save your shoulder lol.
Im curious on how they casted the spheres in metal back then. Anyone?
I shoot mine from the shoulder all the time and I gotta say I don’t notice any bigger ’thump’ than any of my larger cal (75) long barreled muskets with 100-120 grain charges. But assuredly I am only launching tennis balls and not cast iron grenades that weigh a few pounds, LOL!
It is also not a blunderbuss … and technically it is not a cannon either, as it does not have carriage nor wheels.
These actually started out as wheellock ignition hand mortars, to launch grenades over castle or fortification walls.
They went out of favor in military use around the F&I War era due to the horrible fuses they had for the grenades that they launched. One would light the grenade fuse before firing, but in the heat of battle, if you got a flash in the pan, you don’t really know if your firelock went off or not, so they would sometimes explode on the shooter.
There are stories abound that the Grenediers would tie a rope to the mortar and if you had a misfire … you would throw it away from you and get down on the ground as low as you could. Then after it went off, the grenade would blast from the barrel, but if the gun was still shootable, you would pull it back to you and try again. I myself haven’t found anything that says that is historically true or correct.
There were some enterprising individuals that then tried turning the grenade around so that the fuse faced the charge, where it would be lit when the launching charge went off. But again, the fuse technology was so unreliable that the explosion of the charge could force the fuse - now lit! - directly into the explosive grenade … exploding it as soon as it left the barrel. Yikes!
It is also not a blunderbuss … and technically it is not a cannon either, as it does not have carriage nor wheels.
These actually started out as wheellock ignition hand mortars, to launch grenades over castle or fortification walls.
They went out of favor in military use around the F&I War era due to the horrible fuses they had for the grenades that they launched. One would light the grenade fuse before firing, but in the heat of battle, if you got a flash in the pan, you don’t really know if your firelock went off or not, so they would sometimes explode on the shooter.
There are stories abound that the Grenediers would tie a rope to the mortar and if you had a misfire … you would throw it away from you and get down on the ground as low as you could. Then after it went off, the grenade would blast from the barrel, but if the gun was still shootable, you would pull it back to you and try again. I myself haven’t found anything that says that is historically true or correct.
There were some enterprising individuals that then tried turning the grenade around so that the fuse faced the charge, where it would be lit when the launching charge went off. But again, the fuse technology was so unreliable that the explosion of the charge could force the fuse - now lit! - directly into the explosive grenade … exploding it as soon as it left the barrel. Yikes!
Last edited:
Never mind I found the link on here.
It was discovered that the main charge would ignite the fuse when it was turned away from the powder. At least with the ground based howitzers and mortars.
Dale, you are one wild and crazy josé! We need more like you.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2020
- Messages
- 855
- Reaction score
- 956
Has modern day black powder reduced the number of misfires of yesteryear?
Yes I know. Didn't know were else to post since it didn't fit any ware. Just realy Cool gear
He also has a video on the Blunderbuss.
That is more fun than a man should be allowed to have inside of a day.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2020
- Messages
- 855
- Reaction score
- 956
I was afraid I couldn't defend my Country since loosing my right eye. Now this! I have a whole new perspective.
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2014
- Messages
- 367
- Reaction score
- 834
I noticed that the grenade was just dropped in, no patch or anything else holding it in. It is possible that the grenade could be flung out of the barrel without tossing the whole gun. Aren't there any surviving grenadier drill manuals from that time that might have addressed it?
At best, the recoil would be awful!
Johnny Tremain
Silversmith in training
Most folks these days dont even know what a blooper was.
Hurt me just looking at the pictures
Hurt me just looking at the pictures
jwbyerly
32 Cal
I think theres an account in ewalds(sp?) Journal of the jaegers using them at charleston in teams, and doing the rope to a stake and the stock wrist thing. The RA didnt want them is my understanding.
jwbyerly
32 Cal
Not in my experience, no
- Joined
- May 2, 2019
- Messages
- 36
- Reaction score
- 33
Actually, because these pieces have a chambered breech and the grenade just sits in there, they don't
fit tightly and there is practically no chamber pressure. It doesn't take much powder to throw a 3 lb grenade a long way. Hence the recoil is not unmanageable unless the chamber is overloaded. The windage around the ball was such that fuses could often be simply pulled around the outside of the ball tied in place and face the change for self ignition on firing without the fuse plug itself ever being exposed to the charge.
Similar threads
