- Joined
- Apr 3, 2004
- Messages
- 15,602
- Reaction score
- 19
rubincam said:-----greggery peck is anti gun-----
Err was...
rubincam said:-----greggery peck is anti gun-----
Tom Black said:I'm sorry I can't. I read it somewhere a year or so ago. It just gets me that someone who has made an un-Godly amount of money making violent gun movies is anti-gun. There was a thread about this over on Frontier Folks a few weeks ago. I knew Redford was anti hunting and I've read that the gov. of CA is also anti-gun. And how much money has he made on his gun movies?
Tom Black
Cantucky
and..(which means ??? pro gun or pro friend,,)I've always supported a certain amount of gun control. I think California has always had a mandatory waiting period, so we were never concerned about it like the rest of the country. Some states didn't have any at all. So I've always supported that. I think it's very important that guns don't get in the wrong hands, and, yes, I would support most of that. I don't know too much about trigger locks. I've never really discussed that with anyone. But I do feel that guns - it's very important to keep them out of the hands of felons or anyone who might be crazy with it.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000142/bio2005: At the National Board of Review awards dinner in New York City, Eastwood joked that he would kill filmmaker Michael Moore if Moore ever showed up at his home with a camera (an evident reference to Moore's controversial interview with Eastwood's friend, actor/Second Amendment advocate Charlton Heston, for the movie Bowling for Columbine (2002)). After the crowd laughed, Eastwood said, "I mean it." Moore's spokesman said, "Michael laughed along with everyone else, and took Mr Eastwood's comments in the lighthearted spirit in which they were given." Publicly, Eastwood has not commented further.
I've always supported a certain amount of gun control. I think California has always had a mandatory waiting period, so we were never concerned about it like the rest of the country. Some states didn't have any at all. So I've always supported that. I think it's very important that guns don't get in the wrong hands, and, yes, I would support most of that. I don't know too much about trigger locks. I've never really discussed that with anyone. But I do feel that guns - it's very important to keep them out of the hands of felons or anyone who might be crazy with it.
I've done a lot of violent movies, especially in the early days. My recent efforts, like The Bridges of Madison County (1995), weren't too violent. In recent years I've done less, and, yes, I am concerned about violence in film. In '92, when I did Unforgiven (1992), which is a film that had a very anti- violence and anti-gun play - anti-romanticizing of gun play theme, I remember that Gene Hackman was concerned about it, and we both discussed the issue of too much violence in films. It's escalated ninety times since Dirty Harry (1971) and those films were made.
Swamp Rat said:It might as well be anti gun because any sane person knows you'll never keep guns from criminals and any gun control measure only further handcuffs law abiding citizens.
sparky911 said:how bout that movie, Outlaw Josey Whales? :rotf:
Mark Painter said:sparky911 said:how bout that movie, Outlaw Josey Whales? :rotf:
:hatsoff: :haha: :rotf:
Enter your email address to join: