DennisA said:
Do we know that he didn't?
I don't
know that Colt didn't carefully hand fit each arbor and barrel assembly, but the very few (and admittedly sparse) descriptions I've read of his assembly process didn't mention it. They do mention hand fitting action parts, even to the point of designating experienced fitters as journeymen and requiring apprenticeships to achieve that position. I am assuming that if he intended no user adjustment he would have done so, and if it was as critical to accuracy as we seem to think, it seems reasonable that it would have been emphasized enough to be noticed. But maybe not.
DennisA said:
I don't know how closely Uberti, ASM (early)and the other quality makers follow the original design specs but they must consider this factor at least somewhat important as the arbor is tapered along the part that goes into the barrel. The arbor slot is likewise tapered. When the barrel is put on by hand the barrel taper will be fully engaged on the arbor at the same time the bottom flat of the barrel contacts the frame flat.
Barrel taper? Is the hole that receives the arbor tapered at the end to match the taper (actually, bevel) in the end of the arbor? I didn't know that.
DennisA said:
You can force it on further with the wedge since the arbor is hardened but the barrel is not doing this repeatedly trying to adjust the b/c gap will eventually open up the hole in the barrel. In the meantime you have forced two tapers together and it will be really hard to take apart.
I'm confused. Which tapers are we trying to force together - the one in the arbor slot against the one on the end of the arbor, or the arbor against the one in the barrel assembly hole, or the arbor slot against the barrel assembly hole? How does that 'open up' the hole in the barrel - is it lengthened or enlarged in radius, or just stretched out of round? I have not seen any such disfigurement on any of my Colts. And I've noticed no extra difficulty in disassembly either. Wouldn't 'opening up the hole in the barrel' make it easier to take apart?
DennisA said:
Some of the less expensive replicas use a constant diameter arbor and sometimes it doesn't extend to the bottom of the arbor slot in the barrel. With these the wedge can move the barrel forward after the bottom has met the frame. This, as madcratebuilder stated, can change the point of impact and it will also open a gap where the frame meets the barrel either bending the pins or wallowing out the holes in the barrel.
Again, no evidence of such damage on my Colts, and it is certainly the case that some suffer from the 'short arbor' feature. I can see how, in theory, using the wedge to adjust cylinder end gap will cause variation in the alignment of the barrel and chamber axes, and thus affect POI; it also affects POA if one uses the front sight. However, I have a hard time seeing the angles involved as being very significant. Perhaps (and this is the most certain thing in all of this) my technique needs more practice to realize the effect.
DennisA said:
The simple fix of ensuring that the arbor bottoms out when the barrel meets the frame precludes any of this happening.
Sorry you don't see it that way but I still maintain that the wedge is meant to hold the barrel on the gun not make adjustments with.
I certainly hope you didn't think I was claiming the wedge wasn't meant for holding the barrel on the gun - I assure you we agree on that. I'm simply adding that the cylinder end gap, which I see as important but not critical, can be adjusted using the wedge, and that Colt understood the user's circumstances would make that necessary, since parts would be interchanged in the field as repairs and salvage occurred.