• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

to .54 or not to .54?

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Johnny,

If all the deer knocked flat by .45 flinters came back to life and stood up it'd look like the world's biggest game farm! Same for the .50 and I use a .54 myself. I am thinking about a project involving a matched pair of Isaac Haines flinters in .45 and a very early Dickert in .54 caliber. I may switch to a Verner if I can work out the specs I want (.45 caliber 44" "B" weight Rice barrel).

-Ray
 
Remember that the quality of the black powder used in the 1820's was probably not as consistent or uniform as the product we buy today. And who can say how well the powder was sorted or graded. Look at the differences in powder granule size for the various " Other " black powders , made by someone other than GOEX, which has become a standard in the USA. There is no doubt in my mind, either, that 150 grains of FFFg, or even FFg would be fairly stout, and give a terrific recoil, especially on those comparatively narrow buttplates of the Hawken rifle. But, then, if you were facing a grizzly bear, would you want anything less? Notice that he did not use that load on anything other than grizzly bear. For Buffalo, he used only 100 grains( two measures of powder). Most people would think that a buffalo would require at least the same charge used for a grizzly bear, no?
 
Back
Top