• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Tow Wads, Part III

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Feb 17, 2010
Messages
1,498
Reaction score
759
Location
mid-Hudson Valley, N.Y.
Today I tried to duplicate the results I got using tow wads fore & aft and the .618" RB (bore sized, Tanner mould), but with GOEX FFg instead of GOEX FFFg, which I ran out of. To compensate for the 85gr. load of FFFg, I used 95gr. FFg. Suffice it to say, the results were terrible: no grouping worth mentioning, flyer on the first shot: I was well and truly bummed! I also had the [not so] bright idea to use that same powder granulation and charge with Circle Fly OP and OS wads + a felt grease wad atop the OP wad. Those results were no better, but no worse either. Next time I'm going to try a smaller, i.e., .597" - .598" RB (Tanner mould) with a .018" pillow ticking patch, but 60gr. - 70gr. FFg @ 50 yd., which certainly couldn't be worse than today's result. Btw, dry and damp swabbing between shots, whether tow- or card stock wads, made little difference in so called accuracy today. Thought you'd like to know or is it a case of misery loving company?
 
Back
Top