You seem to miss the point of the objections....
No matter how you shake, rattle and roll it, Hollywood is an illusion. They do the best they can.
Really? Being from a Television family myslef, having worked on and in both historic miniseries and stuff for the Discovery Channel...NO THEY DON'T.
Hollywood has come a long way from doctored Trapdoor Springfields to Replica Brown Besses.
Which is why we find fault with what they do TODAY. Nobody is really miffed that in 1937 Spencer Tracy has the wrong gun, wrong hat, and wrong clothes.
It's not just in the historic pieces, but in the VAST MAJORITY of what they do. Poor scripts from LAZY RESEARCH or NO RESEARCH at all, and it's not because they aren't historians, but because they simply don't care, and think most of us are stupid.
HEAT by Michael Mann (who also did Last of The Mohicans). I love Mann's work but his shootout was one of the WORST premised scenarios. Pacino and his crew set up around a bank in the middle of the day where bank robbers are KNOWN to have fully automatic weapons, and intend to engage in a running gun battle? Pacino's entire crew of cops would all be suspended 20 minutes after the shooting stopped.
Last of The Mohicans by Mann, they hired Dale Dye and some other clown to teach the extras the musket drill.... Dye is a well known name as a
modern military movie advisor, but he doesn't know the drill, nor did his assisstant. 18th century musket drill is no more complicated than what they hashed together. Would it have been so tough to do it right???
HAWAII Five-0 remake....episode 1 Danno picks up a spent shell casing from a crime scene with his pencil, and drops it into his shirt pocket, not to mention without crime scene photos, etc. REALLY? (That manure went out with Sgt Joe Friday and DRAGNET 1969)
Back to historic stuff,
REIGN about Mary Queen of Scotts, created by Stephanie SenGupta (the same "genius" who did Hawaii Five-0 reboot)...the Scottish boyfriend of one of Queen Mary's ladies wanders into the castle of the King of France, and finds his lady taking a bath...all without speaking French, never having been inside the castle before, not being stopped by any guards, after travelling all the way from Scotland. REALLY? (one of many "problems" with that show)
In
The Patriot they changed the name of Bannaster Tarleton to
Colonel Tavington, and set him as the villain. OK we get that they did some camera tests with the bad guys in the proper
green uniforms, and this confused the average joe, so they put Tavington's men in red coats too. No complaints
But in
TURN they took the name of a very honorable man, John Graves Simcoe, and used that for a very villainous character. The real Simcoe in Canada
"...
was instrumental in introducing institutions such as the courts, trial by jury, English common law, freehold land tenure, and the abolition of slavery. Slavery was ended in Upper Canada long before it was abolished in the British Empire as a whole; by 1810, there were no slaves in Upper Canada, but the Crown did not abolish slavery throughout the Empire until 1834." (Wikipedia) So why not change the name of the villain to Simpson, or Blackcoe or such?
Especially when there is often LOTS of nasty stuff that you can use that actually happened, so why make stuff up? Remember the church burning in
Patriot? Well it NEVER HAPPENED, but Tarleton's men did ride into a regiment of Virginians who were surrendering and holding their muskets above their heads.... hacked them to pieces with sabers...so why invent the church scene? Heath Ledger's family could've been put into a prison ship to rot...that would've been horrible and accurate...
The problem is with the
poor, lazy writing done by hack writers for hack producers... and much less the material faults such as the proper muskets and such.
LD