BowerR64 said:
I thought you want the thinest patch right? A thick patch may help the fit of the ball tight but it doesnt help the ball fit into the rifeling like a larger ball and a thinner patch?
First off, the ball in a single shot muzzleloading pistol never fits into the grooves.
It does on a Cap & Ball pistol but those are a horse of a different color.
Generally speaking, when talking about patches and balls, it's the combination of the ball size plus the patch thickness that determines how well a muzzleloader will shoot. Not just one or the other.
A tight fitting patched ball usually is more accurate. A large ball and thin patch could work but the patch must be thick enough to fill and compress slightly into the rifling grooves.
Likewise, a smaller ball with a thick patch can work but again, the the patch must be compressed into the rifling grooves.
Here is where a rifle has a distinct advantage over a pistol.
The rifle being large and easy to place against the ground when ramming the patched ball makes loading some very tight ball/patch combinations moderately easy. For instance a .50 caliber rifle can be loaded with a .495 diameter ball and a .018 thick patch. That patch/ball combination will be .531 diameter before it is loaded.
It can be shot with some very heavy rifle loads without destroying the patch.
This is not practical with a muzzleloading pistol.
The pistols small size and fairly weak grip makes getting a good grip and good support to take the load of starting a ball/patch combination like the .495 ball + .018 patch almost impossible.
Fortunately, most pistol loads are far lighter than the rifle loads so looser ball/patch combinations can be used without loosing accuracy.
For instance, in a .50 caliber pistol a .490 diameter ball with a .010-.012 thick patch will work nicely.
It still is .510-.514 in diameter before loading and in most pistols the .010 thick patch will fill the barrels grooves.