Vic..I guess we will repectfully have to agree to disagree. I have been an avid deer hunter for the past thirty years and while I claim to be no expert I am no novice either. I hunt with rifle, blackpowder and am a Traditional archer. I also hold a Bachelors degree in Natural Resorces. Personally I believe that the states 2 gallon limit on baiting is not the villain that the DNR would like all pure and ethical hunters to believe. I have hunted the Chequamegon National forest in Bayfeld County since the mid 70's. Ive had some good years in the past and some lean years, especially after a harsh winter. Deer movement has always been best in the early morning hours or late afternoon towards dusk. The reason is simple, deer feel safer from hunters and predators during low light conditions. It has always been this way, even before baiting became popular. In recent years I have watched the hunting go from bad to worse in my beloved area. Last year my son and I saw a sum total of one doe in seven hard days of hunting. This year for the first time in my life I am contemplating staying closer to home and hunting private land in farm country, just so my kids can see a deer and not lose interest in a sport that is such a big part of my life. The problem in the Northern forests of Wisconsin in my opinion isnt the limited baiting that is now allowed, sure there are slob hunters out there that violate the rules, I say arrest them. The problem is the overharvest of does on public lands by both hunters and Wolves. Originally our DNR set a population goal of 150 Wolves for our state. The current population estimate is now closing in on 500 with no end in sight. Recently Wolves have moved into dairy country where I live on the Door County Peninsula. The pictures of which were published in our local paper. Wolves have moved into our part of the state because of natural dispersal caused by too many other packs in the more traditonal and less human populated areas of our northern forests. Recently I have seen more wolf sign than deer sign in our hunting area. Combine this with the T zone antlerless hunts, earn a buck hunts and virtually unlimited antlerless tags and its no wonder that our traditional public lands have little left to give. While I do believe we should harvest does and I do, I dont believe in our DNR's current deer populaton estimates. While there may be pockets of higher than desired deer density, these areas are primarily on private lands in the central and southern portions of our state. Public lands are slowly but surely becomming a biolgical desert. All the while the DNR blames baiting... What will be the next DNR crusade against harmful and so-called unethical practices? Food Plots,Deer Drives,elevated tree-stands? Vic.. you sound like a an excellent ethical hunter, the kind of person I'd like I'd feel comfortable with hunting accross the next ridge from me. I commend you for your faith in our DNR, but I have no such blind faith, I'm a doubting Thomas,and for me seeing is believing.