Use of fine shot in colonial America

L & R
the hawken shop
Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Some northern tribes made a sieve by piercing birch bark, then pouring molten lead thru that into water. The result was some fairly decent small shot. Pretty simple yet ingenious device that saved the labor of cutting lead strips, although that was no doubt used as well.
 
Shot was used in the 18th century. The PDF :
Highways to History: The Archaeology of Connecticut’s
18th-Century Lifeways
There were excavations of several 18th century homesteads in Connecticut. This PDF has some great pics of artifacts. On page 67 of the PDF, it shows pics of round ball and two different types of shot that was found both round shot and cut shot.. On page 75 of the PDF, it talks about all the different sizes of shot that would have been used for hunting different game animals. The whole PDF is a really interesting read with all the stuff that was dug up on the different 18th century sites. Here is the link to the PDF:
https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/dot/highwaystohistorypdf.pdf

Ohio Rusty ><>
 
Last edited:
smoothshooter said:
I don’t think it was generally available and so was rarely used.
Safe bet that even most waterfowl was killed with rifles or smooth rifles or regular smoothbores loaded with a few buckshot/Rupert shot.
Click to expand...
Small shot was absolutely widely available:
“At first, single shot was used for target-shooting and four-footed game; by the 1540s multiple shot was also used, at this date cut from lead sheet. By the end of his life Henry possessed 41 such “Haile Shotte peics”, clearly used for birds. These were obviously pretty deadly, as an Act of 1548 at-tempted to ban the “shoting of hayle-shot wherby an infinite sort of fowle is killed and much gaym therby distroyed” and lamented their uselessness to military training. These weapons, loaded with shot, can be regarded as the remote ancestors of the modern shotgun.” https://www.thefield.co.uk/shooting/history-shotgun-shooting-26590

“In 1686, Richard Blome’s “The Gentleman’s Recreation” became the first English publication portraying the shooting of flying birds. By the early 18th century, overhead shots were becoming a fairly common practice.

In 1776, the first recorded use of the term “shotgun” arose in a Kentucky publication called “Frontier Language of the West” by James Fenimore Cooper. This term separated the smoothbore shotgun from the rifled musket as advancements in technology greatly changed firearm barrel designs.” https://blog.gritrsports.com/the-history-of-the-shotgun/

Jay
 
smoothshooter said:
I don’t think it was generally available and so was rarely used.
Safe bet that even most waterfowl was killed with rifles or smooth rifles or regular smoothbores loaded with a few buckshot/Rupert shot.
Click to expand...
I should add that I was thinking out of habit more of what we would call #4 though #8 nicely uniformed shot. I knew about the square, Rupert, and swan shot.
 
smoothshooter said:
I don’t think it was generally available and so was rarely used.
Safe bet that even most waterfowl was killed with rifles or smooth rifles or regular smoothbores loaded with a few buckshot/Rupert shot.
Click to expand...
Shot and rifles don't work together well, and colonial rifles were a relatively small bore compared to militia muskets, so no, it's not a safe bet.
 
There's allot of game that can be taken without the use of a Shotgun or rifle..
Back then. If it mattered to conserve ammunition and time..
There hunting wasn't always all sporting like. That's all.

Just poachers. They were.
 
Just an example..

Without a season for duck..

Come spring time.. a piece or bread and a throw net.. that's like 4 ducks in one shot
 
I have a collection of antique English sporting memorabilia and accessories related to wing-shooting. Among the items is a Bill of Laden that shows one of the line items "Shot 7 - 450 k" with the destination of New Boston, N. America. I always wondered if this was bags, a barrel or what. That's a heavy container if it's one. Anyway, someone was buying it in the U.S.A. There's no other detail, nor shotgunning related items on this Bill of Laden. I guess it's size 7 shot and 450 Kilograms? There are other items, like "Leaf 200 - Brn. 100" that I cannot figure out what it refers to. Then there's "Shaft 100, 160". That is assumed to be like shovel handles of English hardwood, 160 mm in length. "Cooper, She., Radc. Dist." is the addressee. I was told this was a distributor, or drygoods store Cooper, Sheath, Radcliffe Distributors. To store 450 kg of #7 shot for sale they had to have a location that would have buyers interested in it.
 
Sparkitoff said:
I have a collection of antique English sporting memorabilia and accessories related to wing-shooting. Among the items is a Bill of Laden that shows one of the line items "Shot 7 - 450 k" with the destination of New Boston, N. America. I always wondered if this was bags, a barrel or what. That's a heavy container if it's one. Anyway, someone was buying it in the U.S.A. There's no other detail, nor shotgunning related items on this Bill of Laden. I guess it's size 7 shot and 450 Kilograms? There are other items, like "Leaf 200 - Brn. 100" that I cannot figure out what it refers to. Then there's "Shaft 100, 160". That is assumed to be like shovel handles of English hardwood, 160 mm in length. "Cooper, She., Radc. Dist." is the addressee. I was told this was a distributor, or drygoods store Cooper, Sheath, Radcliffe Distributors. To store 450 kg of #7 shot for sale they had to have a location that would have buyers interested in it.
Click to expand...
If the are using metric weights it is not that old. The English used pounds feet and miles. Today they still mix metric and English to some extant
 
Tumbledown said:
Shot and rifles don't work together well, and colonial rifles were a relatively small bore compared to militia muskets, so no, it's not a safe bet.
Click to expand...
What I meant was that a lot of waterfowl were killed with rifles firing single bullets.
I know it works because I have done it myself years ago.
In the old days there were no game laws and no one carrying a rifle would have passed up a shot at a duck or a goose just because they didn’t have a smoothbore of some sort loaded with small shot.
 
smoothshooter said:
What I meant was that a lot of waterfowl were killed with rifles firing single bullets.
I know it works because I have done it myself years ago.
In the old days there were no game laws and no one carrying a rifle would have passed up a shot at a duck or a goose just because they didn’t have a smoothbore of some sort loaded with small shot.
Click to expand...
Wild Sports in the Far West by Friedrich Gerstacker, lots of references to shooting wildfowl with a rifle.

Different sensibility toward shooting sitting game back then.
 
French Colonial said:
Wild Sports in the Far West by Friedrich Gerstacker, lots of references to shooting wildfowl with a rifle.

Different sensibility toward shooting sitting game back then.
Click to expand...
True. But when you get down to it, what is the difference between shooting a hopping squirrel, standing deer, etc., and shooting a duck swimming on a pond?
 
Sparkitoff said:
I have a collection of antique English sporting memorabilia and accessories related to wing-shooting. Among the items is a Bill of Laden that shows one of the line items "Shot 7 - 450 k" with the destination of New Boston, N. America. I always wondered if this was bags, a barrel or what. That's a heavy container if it's one. Anyway, someone was buying it in the U.S.A. There's no other detail, nor shotgunning related items on this Bill of Laden. I guess it's size 7 shot and 450 Kilograms? There are other items, like "Leaf 200 - Brn. 100" that I cannot figure out what it refers to. Then there's "Shaft 100, 160". That is assumed to be like shovel handles of English hardwood, 160 mm in length. "Cooper, She., Radc. Dist." is the addressee. I was told this was a distributor, or drygoods store Cooper, Sheath, Radcliffe Distributors. To store 450 kg of #7 shot for sale they had to have a location that would have buyers interested in it.
Click to expand...
That would be “Bill of Lading”
 
andy52 said:
This would be a good place to start your research on the subject.

https://www.minnesotatrap.com/history-in-the-making/shot-towers-page-1.htm
Click to expand...
1732894367385.png
 
flconch53 said:
If the are using metric weights it is not that old
Click to expand...
I am not sure if those #'s are weights.
smoothshooter said:
That would be “Bill of Lading”
Click to expand...
Agreed, but this one says "Laden"

So many abbreviations, it would have been hard for anyone to decipher in my opinion.

I'm pretty sure it is bird shot being shipped though, based on Shot 7. I can't figure out what else would be coming from England that would be referred to as such. The 450 "k" might be an H. I am not certain what the 450 refers to - someone said H could mean hampers, which was a certain sized shipping container. Then I wonder how big is a hamper that there's 450 of them? I'm not sure. Only that Shot 7 got sent to the US in 1865.
 
The title of this thread was "Use of Fine Shot in Colonial America" I'm just assuming that "Fine" would not include swan shot or cut shot.
 

Similar threads

Newaygo77
Kibler 58 Colonial or (future) Fowler?
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
brazosland
brazosland
P
New member intro...
Replies
15
Views
630
Prairie Banditti
P
thesethawa
"Use of shot is not permitted"
2 3 4
Replies
70
Views
6K
smoothshooter
S
bizee
  • Locked
WITHDRAWN Smooth Bore Trade Gun
Replies
6
Views
1K
bizee
bizee
Flint62Smoothie
The PA ‘One-of-a-Kind’ Flintlock Deer Season Turns 50!
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
CAPTAIN
CAPTAIN

Latest posts

Back
Top