I've mentioned in my posts about testing this load and the photo essay on loading it that the devil is in the details.
I am convinced there is more to why this works than just the heavily lubbed "cushion wad" on top of the shot.
When I simply placed said lubed wad over the shot I saw little to no pattern improvement. My usual load is powder, then 2 thin "overshot" cards, a lubed felt wad, shot (whether in an paper shot cup/cartridge or not), topped with 2 more overshot cards. When I removed the wads between powder and shot and only used one "nitro card" as prescribed in SkyChief's proprietary instructions, between powder and shot, much improved. I once forgot the thin overshot card between shot and lubed wad on top, pattern deteriorated, but still was better (more even) than most "normal" loads, just not as tight as the true SkyChief load.
I have noticed that those who describe I'm detail their loading process in trying this, and claim it doesn't work, have always deviated somewhere from the exact SkyChief instructions. I have found any deviation reduces its effectiveness. Even just the misplacement of a thin card.
Because just simply placing a lubed cushion wad doesn't produce even close to the same improvement as the full Skychief load followed correctly, I feel that there is more to why this works than the placement of that wad.
I do think the "drafting" theory has some merit, as well as the well lubed bore ahead of the shot. But, it would seem what is under, or not under, the shot plays a roll.
If you are not getting results with this, go back to the original recipe and follow it closely. Check your shot and powder measurements/proportions. You shouldn't need a ton of shot, but slightly more shot than powder by volume is good.