Arrived!! British Sea Service Pistol from Loyalist Arms!!

[Jappo]

I have small cannon fuses. I believe they make two sizes?

 

[wiscoaster]

First shots report here:
https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/...did-you-do-today.134755/page-814#post-2718276

 

[Rudyard]

Once again Loyalist Arms show they care for their offerings & the customers .I got an original unused SS barrel . I think Ex Dixie its 9" brl the altered by Govt one ,I had parts of old locks so knocked one up . Heavy brutes but needed to be . Regards Rudyard

 

[BCWILL]

First shots report here….

My favourite part of your video !

 

[wiscoaster]

@BCWILL - thanks, but now you'll have to post one of you shooting yours.

 

[springfield art]

The British Sea Service Pistol I ordered from Loyalist Arms back in early March has finally arrived. It was sent in two shipments: one with stock and barrel and the other with lock and belt clip. No explanation why. I presume it has something to do with export/import convenience. Both packaged extremely well and arrived 100% intact. The second shipment also included instructions on how to "proof" the pistol. It hasn't been test-fired, so I guess it's up to the end user to make sure the pistol won't blow up. They even included one ball to do that. Hah!! Not something Pedersoli would do, I don't imagine.

First impressions: the finish is rather dull and opaque and screams for some light refinishing and certainly some hand-rubbed oil. I can't tell what the wood is like until I get into that. The lock seems rather nice and robust and the springs seem nicely balanced. The **** engages and releases nicely. The trigger has the appropriate amount of play at full ****. The flint is stiking the frizzen rather high but I think flipping the flint should be enough to remedy that. Included is a nice flint that looks to be a French flint. Some of the inletting leaves something to be desired, but not material to function, not noticeable at a casual glance, and anyway, I might be able to remediate that to some degree when refinishing. The bore looks nice and smooth, though I might do some additional polish. Finally, this gun is lighter in weight than I thought it would be.

This is not a factory-finished production gun ready to be shot, but it's a giant step up from a kit. So, I'd classify it as a simple project gun, perfect for the upcoming weekend.

And looking forward to being shot. But first, awaiting an order of some .600 balls from Track of the Wolf.

A long wait, but looks to be worth it. And satisfied with Loyalist Arms as vendor. Linda Higgins is your contact at Loyalist if you have any questions about their offerings.

View attachment 353203

View attachment 353204

View attachment 353205

View attachment 353206

These are really cool; but I was amazed to see how large they are, once I saw one in person @ Dixon's. Very historic and interesting, though. Good!

 

[BCWILL]

@BCWILL - thanks, but now you'll have to post one of you shooting yours.

That’s the plan……
Eventually anyways!

 

[FlinterNick]

I guess it’s for piece of mind….if it doesn’t blowup with a double charge then it’s likely gonna last forever with the “standard” loads. Also in the event one should accidentally “double” charge it down the road I guess one can assume it will survive…
I usually just give er abit of a heavy charge to start….then settle down to my usual loads
I see little value in stressing things out right off the bat !?
Of course that’s oppinion and others will surely disagree

There is absolutely no benefit to proofing your own barrel, telling anyone you proofed your own barrel is actually an incredible amount of legal liability to take on as there are no proofing standards in the USA.



just keep your loads reasonable.

 

[wiscoaster]

There is absolutely no benefit to proofing your own barrel, telling anyone you proofed your own barrel is actually an incredible amount of legal liability to take on as there are no proofing standards in the USA.



just keep your loads reasonable.

Same conclusion I came to.