Bark inclusion ideas

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Oct 31, 2024
Messages
183
Reaction score
296
Location
ND
So I bought a kibler SMR today with a bark inclusion in the comb. I was wondering what you guys think I should do about it. I’m inclined to file it out and make a patch to fill it but what are my other options? Have yall seen any other authentic patches such as black pine pitch fillers? Should I just stabilize it and call it a feature, lol. I know the easy thing is to fill it with black epoxy and call it good but epoxy wasn’t around in the 1800’s. I’m going to use a couple coats of iron nitrate stain and make it pretty dark. Here’s a picture of it…..
IMG_7955.jpeg
IMG_7957.jpeg
IMG_7959.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I’m inclined to file it out and make a patch to fill it but what are my other options?
No to the patch idea in my opinion. And is it a bark inclusion or a bug hole, not that it matters? Not being structural, I would just finish the stock however you planned and in your words, ‘call it a feature’ and enjoy it. Makes your gun unique.

Remember, back in the day, all stock wood was perfect and defect free…., wasn’t it?
 
It’s a bark inclusion. the issue I see with a patch is due to the staining it’ll stand out more but, it would be authentic. I sort of like well done patches on old guns, and they seem to have held up a couple hundred years in some cases. I wonder if they would have even bothered with a patch on a basic southern rifle? It’s a pretty small void. I need to email Kiblers tomorrow and ask for a piece of scrap to get thrown in if they have some, just in case, plus it’s nice to have for testing finish but for now I’m really on the fence.
 
Last edited:
I sort of like well done patches on old guns, and they seem to have held up a couple hundred years in some cases.
Patches well done on old guns are unique and add to the character of the gun. As long as you plan to ‘age’ or ‘antique’ the gun, it would look ok to good to me. I just don’t care for patches on otherwise pristine new looking guns. Just one uneducated individual’s opinion stating what they prefer and like. Ultimately your gun, so have at it as you please. Nothing wrong with that.
 
It will definitely be darker and aged.
I’ve seen photographs of guns ‘aged’ with what appeared to be a poor rattle can camouflage job, and the artist getting upset when folks didn’t love it. Aging a gun is an art form in my opinion. Check out some of Mike Brooks’ guns for examples. There are others, though their names escape me at the moment.
 
You do a great job working your stains, with that curl I would just recommend fill and blend.
I have a stock that Jim had filled the inclusion, don’t even see it.
 
Mine had this inclusion. I was skeptical and talked with Jim. He said it would be fine and hardly noticeable after I finished the gun. He was right. In fact it blended right in. Unfortunately I don't have a picture of that side of the stock handy right now.
1000001488.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 1000001486.jpg
    1000001486.jpg
    1.1 MB

Latest posts

Back
Top