Richard Allen
40 Cal.
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2003
- Messages
- 118
- Reaction score
- 0
We may as well realize this is an issue that everyone will never agree upon.
The opponents argue they are commited to doing everything they can to prevent anyone from accidentally shooting themselves through the head. They believe one accidental discharge while someone's head is over a barrel is one too many. They contend there are safer ways to extinguish embers and soften fouling that do not require placing one's head in front of the barrel. They tend to view the proponents in the same light as people that refuse to wear seat belts in cars and life jackets in boats, smoke while handling gunpowder, drink and drive and take other unnecessary risks. They feel that new muzzleloader shooters often mimic things they see experienced shooters doing because they appear to know the proper way to do it, and that promoting blowing into a barrel puts new shooters at a greater risk than the "experts".
The proponents argue putting their mouth over the end of a muzzleloader barrel is no more dangerous than putting one's hand in front of the barrel. They contend there is no documented evidence of an injury or death related to blowing into the muzzle of a muzzleloader barrel and that proves it is not dangerous. They tend to view the opponents as Range Nazis, doom sayers, and busy bodies. They feel that they are not causing new shooters to place their heads in front of a barrel just because they saw the "experts" do it.
Maybe we should just agree to disagree.
Richard/Ga.
The opponents argue they are commited to doing everything they can to prevent anyone from accidentally shooting themselves through the head. They believe one accidental discharge while someone's head is over a barrel is one too many. They contend there are safer ways to extinguish embers and soften fouling that do not require placing one's head in front of the barrel. They tend to view the proponents in the same light as people that refuse to wear seat belts in cars and life jackets in boats, smoke while handling gunpowder, drink and drive and take other unnecessary risks. They feel that new muzzleloader shooters often mimic things they see experienced shooters doing because they appear to know the proper way to do it, and that promoting blowing into a barrel puts new shooters at a greater risk than the "experts".
The proponents argue putting their mouth over the end of a muzzleloader barrel is no more dangerous than putting one's hand in front of the barrel. They contend there is no documented evidence of an injury or death related to blowing into the muzzle of a muzzleloader barrel and that proves it is not dangerous. They tend to view the opponents as Range Nazis, doom sayers, and busy bodies. They feel that they are not causing new shooters to place their heads in front of a barrel just because they saw the "experts" do it.
Maybe we should just agree to disagree.
Richard/Ga.