I DON'T KNOW HOW TO BEGIN A NEW SUBJCT.
SO THIS DOES HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH BURNED PATCHES.
I OBCE HAD A VERY CHEAP FLINTLOCK THAT REQUIRED REPLACEMENT OF THE LOCK ITSELF, I COULD NEVER GET THAT RIFLE TO HIT THE PAPER. . I FINALLY GAVE IT AWAY TO A REVEREND WHO WANTED A RIFLE TO USE IN TRAINING YOUNGSTERS DOWN IN FLORIDA, IF I REMENENBER CORRECTLY.
I MENTIONED THAT PROBLEM TO THE REV AND HE SAID THAT WAS NO PROBLEM AT ALL/ THERE WAS A WEE FLECK OF METAL AT ONCE SIDE OF THE MUZZLE WHICH WAS CAUSING AN UNEVEN PRESSURE FROM THAT SIDE CAUSING THE BALL TO BE DEFLECTED AWAY FROM THE INTENDED PATH.
YEARS LATER I WAS WONDERINGWHY AN OTHERWISE CORRECTLY LOADED RIFLE WITH A SLIGHTLY TOO THIN A PATCHING WHICH ALLOWED BLOW BY AND THE RESULTANT BURNED PATCHING WOULD NOT STILL BE ACURATE.. HARKING BACK ( I DON'T GET TO USE "HARKING" VERY OFTEN) HARKING BACK TO THE WEE METAL FLECK IT OCCURED TO ME JUST A GUESS, THAT IF THE BLOW BY WAS NOT EVENLY SPREAD AROUND THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THEPATCHED BALL WOULDN'T THERE BE AN UNEVEN PRESSURE EXERTED ON THE BALL AS IT LEFT THE MUZZLE AWAY TOWARD THE SIDE WHERE THERE WAS LESS PRESURE THUS DEFLECTING THE [ATH OF COURSE , NOT A LOT PERHAPS BUT SOME, DIRECTION AWAY FROMTHE INTENDED PATH.
JUST A THOUGHT AND ANOTHER ARGUMENT FOR THE WELL FITTED PATCH.
I CANNOT THINK OF A WAY TO TEST THIS THOUGHT BUT IS SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT
DUTCHSCHOULTZ
SO THIS DOES HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH BURNED PATCHES.
I OBCE HAD A VERY CHEAP FLINTLOCK THAT REQUIRED REPLACEMENT OF THE LOCK ITSELF, I COULD NEVER GET THAT RIFLE TO HIT THE PAPER. . I FINALLY GAVE IT AWAY TO A REVEREND WHO WANTED A RIFLE TO USE IN TRAINING YOUNGSTERS DOWN IN FLORIDA, IF I REMENENBER CORRECTLY.
I MENTIONED THAT PROBLEM TO THE REV AND HE SAID THAT WAS NO PROBLEM AT ALL/ THERE WAS A WEE FLECK OF METAL AT ONCE SIDE OF THE MUZZLE WHICH WAS CAUSING AN UNEVEN PRESSURE FROM THAT SIDE CAUSING THE BALL TO BE DEFLECTED AWAY FROM THE INTENDED PATH.
YEARS LATER I WAS WONDERINGWHY AN OTHERWISE CORRECTLY LOADED RIFLE WITH A SLIGHTLY TOO THIN A PATCHING WHICH ALLOWED BLOW BY AND THE RESULTANT BURNED PATCHING WOULD NOT STILL BE ACURATE.. HARKING BACK ( I DON'T GET TO USE "HARKING" VERY OFTEN) HARKING BACK TO THE WEE METAL FLECK IT OCCURED TO ME JUST A GUESS, THAT IF THE BLOW BY WAS NOT EVENLY SPREAD AROUND THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THEPATCHED BALL WOULDN'T THERE BE AN UNEVEN PRESSURE EXERTED ON THE BALL AS IT LEFT THE MUZZLE AWAY TOWARD THE SIDE WHERE THERE WAS LESS PRESURE THUS DEFLECTING THE [ATH OF COURSE , NOT A LOT PERHAPS BUT SOME, DIRECTION AWAY FROMTHE INTENDED PATH.
JUST A THOUGHT AND ANOTHER ARGUMENT FOR THE WELL FITTED PATCH.
I CANNOT THINK OF A WAY TO TEST THIS THOUGHT BUT IS SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT
DUTCHSCHOULTZ