Emden(???) matchlock - unmarked barrel/lockplate

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Jun 20, 2023
Messages
26
Reaction score
53
Location
TX
Greetings all,

I am trying to research a matchlock (sadly not mine, hence no pictures) and am hitting a dead end. Hoping you all might give me some idea of whether or not that’s because I’m looking in the wrong places, or if what I’m looking for doesn’t exist.

The gun in question is a very nice looking early 17th century Germanic matchlock, of full-size prior to the diminution in size during the 30 Years War (over 155 cm). The stock is in amazing shape, with nailed sheet metal buttplate. Notably, the stock bears the typical stylized “E” brand and a seeming two-digit rack number associated with the Emden armory. The barrel is octagonal transitioning to round, with incised wedding bands. The ramrod matches well and is iron-tipped.

The lockplate, however, appears unmarked. The barrel likewise is devoid of any manufacturer’s mark, and also lacks the stylized “E” seen on every other Emden musket I can find online. A two-digit number is stamped into the top flat of the barrel, but does not match the stock number. This looks most similar to a rack number; I don’t think it is a date, as dated barrels I have seen tend to have the whole year with 4 digits.

I have been scouring the usual suspects - here, historical vikingsword threads, and the big auction houses - and cannot find another good example of an Emden matchlock without the “E” and manufacturer’s stamps (usually Suhl, sometimes Zella) on the barrel. Has anyone else seen something like this? Does this necessarily suggest extensive wear/polishing of the metal to the point that the stamps (usually pretty strong) have been erased?

Any thoughts are most appreciated.
 

No, that one I actually already own. I showed that one in a thread awhile back:

https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/...st-some-matchlocks-period-accessories.182489/

That musket is very cool and does have the “E” and makers’ stamps. However, the stock is not in the greatest shape and the rear sight is missing.

But, I have decided to also purchase the other musket I was describing in my opening post, so I don’t really have a reason to be coy any longer:

https://www.bolk-antiques.nl/invent...-very-good-condition-price-8-500-euro-5174039

This one, as I say, doesn’t have any obvious remaining marks on the barrel except the aforementioned rack number. But the stock appears superb, and it retains a rear sight similar to other muskets currently displayed in the Ostfriesisches Landesmuseum Emden.

Basically from a collecting perspective they are mirror opposites. The Bonhams musket has great metal and the Bolk musket has great wood, ha!

I will post more pics when I receive it.
 
Received the musket today! An impressive piece, overall length 62” / 157.48 cm; barrel length 46” / 116.84 cm; weight 12 lb 12.7 oz / 5.804 kg. The stock well marked twice with the Emden “E” and “12”. Lockplate unmarked apart from incised vertical lines; barrel marked “43” with bands demarcating octagonal-to-round transition, no other markings visible. Retains the rear and front sights. Serpentine with monster-head engraving. Matching wooden ramrod appears original, with iron tip. Metal looks like it has been polished, similar to other muskets in the present museum display at Emden. Typical sheet-metal buttplate retained by nails; trigger guard of typical shape with pointed finials. As promised, a few prelim photos:

aDDzZqz.jpeg


0CVebfB.jpeg


Nkli0hl.jpeg


N6ei55j.jpeg


R0vukuV.jpeg


wk2OktX.jpeg


TXSfSGc.jpeg


wWQH1rW.jpeg


Yw0cGS5.jpeg



pp0zXjN.jpeg
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top