That is a very nice looking lock! I wonder what tool is used to to make the ridges on the frizzen face.
If you have the opportunity, could you post a picture of what the stock inlet for a Miquelet looks like?
That is a very nice looking lock! I wonder what tool is used to to make the ridges on the frizzen face.
That could also be the case. The holes look like they were drilled long ago. Not sure.I wonder if the holes in the pan were for some kind of mounting deal for display in a museum?
Those long jaws are weirdly unsettling. It’s like the uncanny valley for fire locks.And here's one more. I've never seen a miquelet lock with jaws this long. It's BIG, like the other one. Chiseled, engraved, and silver mounted. From about the same time period as the other.
Rick
View attachment 278388View attachment 278391View attachment 278393View attachment 278394View attachment 278388
Hi Tob, See below. What is interesting about this one is that it was originally a flintlock. The mortise was expertly filled with wood and re-carved to accept a miquelet lock. All done during the period. Lock is of course original, but ****, top jaw, and screw are replacements from TRS.That is a very nice looking lock! I wonder what tool is used to to make the ridges on the frizzen face.
If you have the opportunity, could you post a picture of what the stock inlet for a Miquelet looks like?
That’s really cool! A good illustration of the smaller profile the Miquelet has on a gun.Hi Tob, See below. What is interesting about this one is that it was originally a flintlock. The mortise was expertly filled with wood and re-carved to accept a miquelet lock. All done during the period. Lock is of course original, but ****, top jaw, and screw are replacements from TRS.View attachment 278422View attachment 278424View attachment 278425View attachment 278426
Rick
LOL. I know. Due also to it's large size, I believe this one was also a styling exercise. Would likely need a LONG flint. Years ago, I was so often tempted to have a gun built using one of these big locks. But then I would come back to my senses realizing the rest of the gun would need to be built with similar style to the lock. And figured that would cost a mountain of $$$$$ LOLThose long jaws are weirdly unsettling. It’s like the uncanny valley for fire locks.
That photo was when I first purchased the gun for a song from a local gun show. That was when I first removed the lock. The gun is all cleaned up now and has a Hoyt liner in the barrel.That’s really cool! A good illustration of the smaller profile the Miquelet has on a gun.
I haven't left yet...................................wulfJust did a search and read some old threads on this topic that seems to bob slowly to the surface here from time to time. Why these firearms -- which played such an important role in the Central and North American historical experience -- continue to be virtually ignored simply baffles me.
It appears TRS is still about the only source of lock castings -- and that no one offers any sort of affordable reproduction. Would love to help light a fire under one of the Indian manufacturers but there would need to be a demonstration of demand. I looked at a bunch of Ricky's original locks, drooled over Flint62Smoothie's elegant .56 and read with a tinge of sorrow posts by Wulf, Tinker2, Bioprof and others who have left us. Sam appears to have made a miquelet mainspring vise he was happy with.
Hi BillThat was a painstaking job of filling the original flintlock mortice Rick. It had to have taken time, patience, skill, very sharp tools, and one would hope, a bench by the window to have decent light.
Yet another possibility. The first big lock I posted is from a maker in Madrid. A well known historical gun making center. But the second big lock, with the long jaws is from a maker in Cordova. A city not known for gun making. This, and the larger than typical size of the locks is how I came up with the theory that sometime just before the turn of the 19th Century there may have been a sort of lock making competition. Something like a contest maybe. Also curious, there is no "official" gold stamp maker's mark on either lock. But they are both indeed signed by their makers. Bit of a mystery.The holes in the pan may have been a way to decommission as many countries require a lot of paperwork to own working guns.
I see where the Circassians got their inspiration for their locks now!And here's one more. I've never seen a miquelet lock with jaws this long. It's BIG, like the other one. Chiseled, engraved, and silver mounted. From about the same time period as the other.
Rick
Enter your email address to join: