Hard-tack recipes?

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
From a Newfies descendent on Mom's side, make a good looking fish chowder, then smash the crap out of it and add ships crackers and then smash some more.

Do not add spice as in salt, pepper or any thing that has taste, serve.

On Dads side being French it would taste very good!! Thank God the French Indian decedents survived until today!!
 
I can only speculate....As Spence pointed out on another topic my source for that name comes from a 21st century book, and I do not know if there is any citation for that term......Feel free to disregard it.... :redface:
 
I made some out of white flour, water, and salt. It was basically inedible when dry, hard as a brick and had to be soaked in something edible to eat it. I saw on one of those WW 2 shows where they cooked it in fat to make it edible.

It will last forever. They ate it in WW 1 and possibly 2 because it was portable and lightweight.

It's pretty awful. The taste is OK but the texture is grim.
 
I did just make a clam chowder and while it was on I got a couple of pieces of ships bread put them in a bag and hammered them to flour and chunks and threw those in with the milk and butter. Made a nice rue and added a twist to the taste. Used them an lobscouse a lot and nothing else taste as good.
 
I made some out of white flour, water, and salt. It was basically inedible when dry, hard as a brick and had to be soaked in something edible to eat it. I saw on one of those WW 2 shows where they cooked it in fat to make it edible.

It will last forever. They ate it in WW 1 and possibly 2 because it was portable and lightweight.

By the time of WWI they had changed dramatically from what they were in the AWI or before, and up to the Civil War.

The flour they used is what we today call, whole wheat pastry flour. Today's flour is from hard, red wheat, while there's was from what we call soft, white wheat. Further, it was the lowest grade flour, called "ship's stuff", which had a lot of bran. So, IF you want to try something closer to what they ate in the 18th century, use whole wheat pastry flour, AND 1/3 of it should be wheat bran. So..., Flour with wheat bran and water, and nothing else. No honey, no sugar, no oil or fat, no salt...., rolled into 1/4 thick paste and cut with a biscuit cutter, or larger, and poked with holes, then dried in a 200 degree oven overnight.

Yeah they are hard but you can eat them plain, though sometimes you have to suck on them a minute or two. I've got a test batch in the basement in a tin...three years old and not moldy yet.

LD
 
There should be a nutritional difference between biscuits/hardtack made today and those made before 1870. That is when they shifted most flour production from stone ground to roller ground, and it is the time they began to remove the wheat germ from flour. The germ contains most of the nutrition of the wheat kernel. Modern whole wheat flour has bran added back in, but they don't add the germ back in because the germ is subject to spoilage. It contains some oil, and that goes rancid after a period of time. I don't know if cooking it into biscuits and drying it stops the oil from becoming rancid, but I would guess it does, otherwise why bother making biscuits for the navy and army. They could just have carried barrels of flour instead. Perhaps the process of making a hard, glossy biscuit somehow sealed the oxygen from getting to most of the oil. It is oxygen that eventually makes oils rancid. Here is an interesting history of flour milling:
https://blog.kathrynmcgowan.com/2009/12/14/a-brief-history-of-flour/

One of the links posted above mentioned "sharps" being added to the biscuits. I'm guessing that may be the part where the kernel attaches to the stem, because it is harder than the rest of the kernel and could be sifted out of the more refined flour. These "sharps" would be made up of mostly germ and bran, and would even further increase the nutritional value of the biscuit. The "middlings" would also be coarser bits of the kernel that were sifted out, and would also contain more bran and germ than the finer sifted flour. Modern white flour is almost completely endosperm, which is the starchy part of the grain, and it is the easiest part to grind, so most of it would end up in the finest sift.

The pre 1870 sea biscuit would have been a fairly complete nutritional package, except for vitamin C, for which limes or cranberries were added, and a little more complete protein that the salt pork would have added. Navy beans would also help to round out the protein needed, without needing as much salt pork.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tenngun said:
I did just make a clam chowder and while it was on I got a couple of pieces of ships bread put them in a bag and hammered them to flour and chunks and threw those in with the milk and butter. Made a nice rue and added a twist to the taste. Used them an lobscouse a lot and nothing else taste as good.

In the novel "Moby Dick" the narrator speaks of chowder that has pounded sea biscuit in it.
 
While it's mostly tasreless it adds a flavor to stuff. Using it for plumb duff,puddings in a haste, coating for feted pork or added to lobscouuse or pea soup just adds a demension you can't get with flour crackers or crotons. Not better but different and tasty.
 
Read this post again and had to make some.

I used King Arthur white whole wheat flour it is courser than the Red Mills white whole wheat pastry flour I can get.

They are baking for the second time as I type. Hopefully after the update I will be able to say how they tasted.
 
Keep in mind that it was called hard tack for a reason .you could make xiliphone keys from it,they are as hard as ebony. You can break a tooth on them if made right. Soak and eat put on soup dip in your coffee, don't try to bite,after all they are iron rations.
 
Back
Top