No human being ever made a law with any power in itself. It is the morality and good sense of individual people to chose to comply with it that makes a law effective (or not)
Actually that's not it at all.
IF the above were true, why do people with good morality and sense need a law written in the first place? Human writing is only about 5200 years old..., human societies go back much much farther. People don't go around as a group "choosing" not to rape, arson, rob, steal, or murder, because somebody wrote down a law and the majority of the rest of the people said, "that's sounds good; I'm going to comply". For most of human history, laws were not written, yet anarchy was not the norm.
It's not morality that caused compliance at all. Human beings have only one basic instinct. Survival. Morality and good sense are a veneer that is easily stripped away when folks think their survival may be at stake, or if they think they are normally living at a survival level. Just look at how many human lemmings have accepted every word from Fauci, the CDC, and WHO, even when a) the math didn't support the claims, and b) no actual study or studies had been conducted to provide the science. Look at how many folks, who have never been accused of a felony, or even a misdemeanor, participate in looting during civil unrest.
I can also point to human societies where their "moral code" is quite different from what you're talking about. For the above to be correct..., it would have to be universal. The reality is, that it's not.
Written laws and policing are present for the small portion of the population, that will choose to test what the vast majority simply would not do...what we today call a "criminal act". They are only a
deterrent when two factors are present.
a) The population that may have some criminal intent, believe they are likely to be
caught if they act in a criminal manner.
b) The population that may have some criminal intent, believe that when caught they will undergo a
punishment that they will find most unpleasant.
Add to that a third factor. Among the population that may have criminal intent, some have violent intent. OF these, some will test the first two principals, and in those cases, a third factor is needed, and that is:
c)
removal from the free population.
There are three types of "removal". These are banishment, incarceration, and execution. The first is not really part of Western Civilization these days, and the last is rapidly being removed as an option. Locking a non-compliant person, whose morals allow them to choose to do violence, is all that is left.
So TODAY what we are seeing is a rise in criminal activity because....,
Those committing the crimes don't think they will be caught, AND they EXPECT that if they are caught, they will not receive an unpleasant punishment. Look at the large numbers of felons who get low sentences, or are released back into the community due to "bail reform" or who get "time off for good behavior", or "time served". Especially the juvenile criminals. No real punishment; parents don't face punishment either.
LD