Please post a source for this info.
It’s extremely common knowledge.
Please post a source for this info.
It’s extremely common knowledge.
Then it shouldn't be hard to post a historical source.
You can find the info yourself, use the googles.
List an author, book, anything, and I'll gladly find it if it exists on the internet. Unfortunately simply searching "how did they clean muzzleloaders in XXXX?" returns conjecture, mostly on forums.
Common sense. Tow was used in period for cleaning the bore. Why go through the labor of weaving it, then cutting it into small bits, only to throw it away? That, and tow and tow worms were standard items carried by soldiers.Do you have a source to base this on?
That certainly makes sense, lots of skin on the hoof but cloth had to be shipped in. When we look at the records what we see is massive amounts of cloth moving west. By the revolutionary war, Indians of the east had almost abandoned deerskin clothing except for moccs and maybe robes. Even robes were replaced largely with blankets.I think thin leather or buckskin would have been used more than linen on the frontier . I would think fine woven cloth would be very expensive and hard to find.
You will find this paper on page 328 of :New Principles of Gunnery: Containing the Determination of the Force of Gunpowder, and Investigation of the Difference in the Resisting Power of the Air to Swift Ad Slow Motions. ... By Benjamin Robins, ... with an Account of His Life and Writings, by James Wilson, M. D." published in 1805. You can read or download that paper at the following link: New Principles of Gunnery: Containing the Determination of the Force of Gunpowder, and Investigation of the Difference in the Resisting Power of the Air to Swift Ad Slow Motions. ... By Benjamin Robins, ... with an Account of His Life and Writings, by James Wilson, M. DPlease post a source for this info.
Here's a good reference for cleaning, and the tools and materials used.
https://www.academia.edu/19696938/_...der_vol_XXI_no_4_September_October_1994_62_66
1st of all, Hi,Hi,
The documentation you seek is the paper by Benjamin Robbins, mathematician and engineer to the East India Company, read to the Royal Society in 1747 titled " Observations of the Nature and Advantage of Rifled Barrel Pieces". Robbins was the first to correctly deduce how rifling and spinning bullets improved accuracy and precision of shooting based on physics rather than the myths and legends often cited by earlier authors. In the paper he describes loading over sized bullets without patches and hammering them home and loading with thin greased leather or cloth patches and undersized bullets. The latter method he attributes to Swiss and German shooters. That Swiss and German gun culture was the source of our American long rifles, hence the practice of patching the bullet became the normal method of American riflemen. There were not many rifles in England in the 17th and early 18th centuries and many of the rifles were breech loaders using bullets larger than the bore. However, British rifle shooters also shot muzzleloaders and either loaded with a patched ball or hammered an oversized ball down the bore. I am not sure the long barreled rifles that became popular in America would be feasible without greased patches. Tow was mostly used to "scour" bores and ramrods usually were made with tow worms on the narrow end if any ferrule was attached.
dave
Tow was used to clean the bores of muzzleloaders. As Judy from Prickets Fort once told us the frontier was cloth poor.I always kind of assumed oil was a given. If you were hunting, you were then in possession of animal fat for oil. The cleaning is what really gets me. I have yet to see anything describe at all how these rifles were usually cleaned. I've seen where many carried a "wiping stick" in addition to their usual ramrod on their gun. Maybe they just used the same patches they loaded balls with? My question is did they just rinse out the barrel and oil? Did they run a couple wet patches through and oil? Did they do the water pumping method?
That picture of the supposed kit for David Cooke is interesting. That is just another thing that shows all that was old, is new again. Clearly he liked a ball board. So it seems whether you cut at the muzzle, use pre-cut, or use a ball board... you are right. I really like how he made the knife sheath built into the bag's strap. That looks like a good way to do it.
It becomes easier to envision cloth patching when the amount being used is small.
Enter your email address to join: