Uhm?,, the sight is on there backwards,,(?)it was my first attempt at this type of soldering and it was pretty easy. I just used some 1/8" brass stock to make a front sight
Uhm?,, the sight is on there backwards,,(?)it was my first attempt at this type of soldering and it was pretty easy. I just used some 1/8" brass stock to make a front sight
Well cudo's to marrying a good woman,I have seen my wife repeatedly and reliably hit a steel turkey silhouette target at 50 yds. with her Ruger .38 snubnose -- which has a front sight and a top strap groove as a rear sight. So there's a lot more than psychological value in one of these with a competent shooter behind it.
Very nice set up. Always more than one way to skin a cat!I did this Remington a while back (sorry it's wearing a conversion cylinder) it was my first attempt at this type of soldering and it was pretty easy. I just used some 1/8" brass stock to make a front sight
I recommend a taller front sight. My front sight is right at 1/4" tall and it is too short for shooting at 5-7 yards (Point of impact is 10+ inches high) this is with 45colt though. Round balls may perform differently. But for a range gun using a six o clock hold isn't a problem to keep shots relatively centered
I also went a different route with cylinder pin retention. I like the aesthetic of the loading lever to much on Remingtons to get rid of it. So I chopped it down and pinned it to the cylinder pin so it all comes off as one assembly being retained by the loading lever screw
View attachment 139580View attachment 139581
So ... Not having seen her shoot this particular gun under that particular condition (or any other), you're going with the view that she was shooting a short-barreled revolver at 50 yds. "intuitively" and not using the sight. One of the endearing features of this forum -- the courage to go where no one has gone before.Well cudo's to marrying a good woman,
But she's probably a natural/intuitive shooter,, my guess is you could probably file the sights off her gun and she'd still hit the target simply by pointing it,
Uhm?,, the sight is on there backwards,,(?)
Definitely put a sight on it, it will make it much more usable. There is zero downside and huge advantages of having sights on a pistol.
I made my own "pocket pistol" for CAS shooting in the Black Powder Cap-n-Ball category, with a Pietta "Confederate" Navy .44 revolver. Didn't put a front sight on it. Never needed it. They were for "up close and personal" situations, and at the CAS events of the time, the targets were plenty close too. Just point and shoot (at paper targets).
LD
They also forget that there are distances where a sight will just slow you down when you need that speed the most. For those doubting this, they need only refer to Bill Jordan's legendary No Second Place Winner. Of course, he had sights on his pistols. He just didn't (and didn't recommend) using them in some of the circumstances that he (and others) were likely to encounter. Hard to argue with that -- and that experience -- but I suppose people will.People oft forget that the point of shooting is hitting.
Where do you think they are held?You might find yourself ending up in some sort of survival situation after one of those CAS matches -- maybe getting lost on the way home -- and need to hunt deer with the pocket pistol. You'll wish you had a sight then!!
Good point.Where do you think they are held?
Yeah. Because a "sight", with that window, at any viewing length,, is useless for any imaginable application at that range outside of hollywood where bullets "bend" trajectory.you're going with the view that she was shooting a short-barreled revolver at 50 yds. "intuitively" and not using the sight.
Very true and that holds for men also that had never shot before. In basic training qualifying with the M14 the highest scorer from the Bn. was a guy from NYC that never held a gun before.We were told at the range that some women (mainly beginners) are better shooters because they don't have to un-learn some of the bad habits that alot of men have.
Really sorry about that. Sorry to have ruined your day.Saddens me you don't get it.
It's great to get this kind of expert insight from someone with such impeccable credentials on this forum. The reasoning and experience are way beyond my own abilities. Literally priceless.necchi said:And I've shot with and/or observed 1,000's
Just to be clear ... this woman was not exactly a beginner. She learned to shoot in the physical education program when an undergraduate at Northwestern University, and has continued to shoot throughout her life: rifle, shotgun, and handgun. She's not much of a handgun lover, but does love her AR-15 and O/U 20 ga. Now, I could be mistaken about this, I suppose, but I've watched her shoot over a period of 50 years now and would not say that she's any kind of "instinctive" shooter. In fact, I've been trying over the past few years to introduce her to more instinctive handgun shooting, and she's just not having it. But hey, I could be all wrong about this and someone who's never seen her could surely know better, right? Yeah.We were told at the range that some women (mainly beginners) are better shooters because they don't have to un-learn some of the bad habits that alot of men have.
Enter your email address to join: