rubincam said:if both sides were shooting their ramrods couldnt a fellow pick up the ramrod that just landed beside him and use it to load or just shoot it back hoping the enemy sends his back likewise????
Gary said:hank said:I read somewhere that the second volley at first Manassas was "like a flight of arrows" so many ramrods were shot ....and the third volley was only a half as loud as the first two, as guys without ramrods couldn't reload...the heat of battle ...Hank
I have a new theory about why cartridge guns replaced muzzleloaders. First, there were labor problems with the ramrod makers guild. They withheld delivery, hoping to drive up the price of ramrods so as to make the gun useless. This infuriated the government. Second, the tree huggers were angry because the trees were hurt and lobbied Congress for the adoption of breechloaders. Finally, the military itself wanted newer breechloaders since the shirkers couldn't deliberately fire off their ramrods and then retreat claiming that their gun was useless. This is Revisionist Hystery at its finest and you read it here first at TheMuzzleLoadingForum. :hatsoff:
Enter your email address to join: