DennisA said:Aw heck Joe I can find a lot more to complain about. You are correct that you do get a lot for $200. As to more machining than a Ruger Blackhawk. I don't know about that. Both companies use a lot of mim (metal injected molding) parts and cnc machines for the machining so I doubt there is a great if any difference."
It would certainly seem easier to bore a cylinder straight through than to bore it part way from the front, part way from the back and cut threads in between. It would seem much easier to turn a round barrel and screw it into a one piece frame than to machine the front of the frame as part of the barrel, bore arbor and alignment pin holes, cut the wedge slot and fit the two parts together. There is certainly a lot more machine time in making a loading lever assembly and fitting it to the barrel than to make an ejector rod and housing.
The Ruger Old Army sold for double the price of the cap & ball imports yet Ruger discontinued it because it was a looser for them.
"Anyway it does make for an interesting discussion and I wonder how many C&B revolver shooters were under the impression that the way Pietta fit their wedges was the way it is supposed to be?
Yes, I'm sure few people never really thought about it. I've encountered quite a few people at the range having very noticeable hangfires at every shot who didn't realize anything was wrong, they thought that was just the way muzzleloaders work. :haha: