Supercracker said:
Just curious. I was moving around some old stuff in the shop and had to go through some old painting gear and buffing compounds and I was thinking.
Is it possible for a bore to be too shiny? With a good buffing compound you can make metal look just like a mirror.
Smooth bores clean easier. But as stated in other posts excessively slick can cause "issues".
Really slick bores may require a lot more power to get a consistent velocity spread.
Also a slick bore will produce LESS velocity for a given charge than a rougher one.
This could be the reason old timers used the roughen the bore when the barrels "shot slick" I have heard of plugging the vent/nipple and filling the bore with urine.
Back to the rough bore.
The British, and perhaps others, used to roughen shotgun bores for a few inches at the breech to improve penetration (velocity) then they would roughen at the muzzle to "retard the wads" to keep them away from the shot as everything cleared the muzzle.
Retarding the shot/wad column at the breech increased pressure and made the powder burn more efficiently so better velocity.
Rifles need a certain amount of "load inertia" to give efficient powder burn. This will give somewhat better velocity and more consistent velocity. So the old timer who lapped the bore with dirt was actually restoring consistency to the loads by increasing friction in the bore OR restoring some harmonic that had been changed by the reduction in bore friction.
But one must be knowledgeable enough to know what "grit" to use.
The same thing could be done with one of the finer Scotch Bright pads found in automotive stores.
It is likely that a slick bore could also be restored by increasing the powder charge by 10 grains or maybe more. This will also increase load inertia and would bring the velocity up if velocity loss from the slick bore was the problem.
Dan