Kibler Fowler News - anything???

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I am interested in the Woodsrunner. When it comes to Kiblers production...I think he knows his market very darn well from how successful he seems to be so far. I would think the Hawkins market is somewhat flooded by ...Hawkins. The fowler sound interesting, but I would think more of a niche market.
The woodsrunner...Like the other two, a firearm of popular styling, but more steered for practical hunting. I would have liked the Colonial in a .45 myself, so thus this may be an option. Just my thoughts.
While a Kibler Colonial in .45 cal. would be nice, it would be heavy. I have Colonials in .54 (Won in a raffle from Martin's Station.) and a .58 cal. kit, and the weight between the two is very significant. I doubt that a smaller weight barrel could be used for the .45, do to the nature of the CNC barrel inletting of the stock.
 
While a Kibler Colonial in .45 cal. would be nice, it would be heavy. I have Colonials in .54 (Won in a raffle from Martin's Station.) and a .58 cal. kit, and the weight between the two is very significant. I doubt that a smaller weight barrel could be used for the .45, do to the nature of the CNC barrel inletting of the stock.
Yep. That is exactly why I went to the .58, to keep it as light as possible. Thus, the Woods Runner I am hoping will have a smaller bbl diameter. I read somewhere that he anticipates the Woods Runner weighing in at 6-7 bls ish. A bit shorter barrel planned also.
 
Yep. That is exactly why I went to the .58, to keep it as light as possible. Thus, the Woods Runner I am hoping will have a smaller bbl diameter. I read somewhere that he anticipates the Woods Runner weighing in at 6-7 bls ish. A bit shorter barrel planned also.
Itll be 7-8 lbs and 39” barrel if I recall correctly
 
While a Kibler Colonial in .45 cal. would be nice, it would be heavy. I have Colonials in .54 (Won in a raffle from Martin's Station.) and a .58 cal. kit, and the weight between the two is very significant. I doubt that a smaller weight barrel could be used for the .45, do to the nature of the CNC barrel inletting of the stock.
Yep. That is exactly why I went to the .58, to keep it as light as possible. Thus, the Woods Runner I am hoping will have a smaller bbl diameter. I read somewhere that he anticipates the Woods Runner weighing in at 6-7 bls ish. A bit shorter barrel planned also.
I shared this earlier, but I’m sure it’s gotten lost in the thread.

Here were some specs shared with me on the Woodsrunner offered by Jim
· .45, .50, .54 caliber
· Same Wood Options
· Round Faced English Lock
· Weight 7 ½ to 8 Lbs.
· Barrel Length 39 ¾”
· Sliding Wood Patchbox Only
· Well Swamped Barrel
· It’s tall at the breech, tapers at the wrist, then tapers more at the entry.
· Very handy and easy to carry
· Has strong influences from an actual rifle. Many believe to have been made in the valley in Virginia probably 1760’s
· Reminds you of a true frontier rifle
 
I shared this earlier, but I’m sure it’s gotten lost in the thread.

Here were some specs shared with me on the Woodsrunner offered by Jim
· .45, .50, .54 caliber
· Same Wood Options
· Round Faced English Lock
· Weight 7 ½ to 8 Lbs.
· Barrel Length 39 ¾”
· Sliding Wood Patchbox Only
· Well Swamped Barrel
· It’s tall at the breech, tapers at the wrist, then tapers more at the entry.
· Very handy and easy to carry
· Has strong influences from an actual rifle. Many believe to have been made in the valley in Virginia probably 1760’s
· Reminds you of a true frontier rifle
That is awesome news...
 
Back
Top