- Joined
- Apr 3, 2004
- Messages
- 15,602
- Reaction score
- 20
Thats exactly what I did when I did my Corps of Discovery tribute, when I hunted with these rifles 2004 - 2006. Built a 1792 and a 1803 and used em both. :thumbsup:
Swamp Rat said:Thats exactly what I did when I did my Corps of Discovery tribute, when I hunted with these rifles 2004 - 2006. Built a 1792 and a 1803 and used em both. :thumbsup:
Russ T Frizzen said:The rifle has proof marks on it?
tsmgguy said:I've recently seen photos of rifle #15, thanks to boardmember Sean, in a well illustrated article that he sent to me. The photos above are of a TRS replica.
The "Salt Lake City Rifle" has been througly used and abused. The proofs and serial are crystal clear, though. It is something very special, indeed. Authors Keller and Cowan are absolutely convinced that #15 was carried on the expedition, as am I.
What convinced me were the numerous references to burst barrels in the journals of both Lewis & Clark. Burst barrels were a characteristic of both the M1803, and the "1800" rifles that Jess mentions, due to weak forward barrel sections, high operating pressures, and the characteristic high muzzle velocities of some 2,000 FPS.
JV Puleo said:........... Serial numbers were not used either until much later. The numbers on the M1803 pistols are there to identify pairs which is how they were issued. Off the top of my head I can't think of any armory-made firearm with a serial number until the trapdoor Springfield. I've seen any number of early rifles with numbers on them but always as a means of identifying the rifle in a particular unit.
JV Puleo said:Well, I'm fully prepared to stand corrected. As I did say, I didn't remember anything off the top of my head but I confess that Harpers Ferry Arsenal has never been a particular interest of mine. I have most of those books but I'm more than willing to take your word for it.
However...even if it is a serial number, it only establishes it as an early one and says nothing about the actual date it was made.
tsmgguy said:I'll forward the email containing the complete Cowan & Keller article to any board member with the computer skills necessary to post it here, and who will agree to do so. The article has excellent photos of the rifle in question. It's a real eye opener. Email me at [email protected]. Remove NOSPAM.
Enter your email address to join: