• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Loading from the pouch?

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
The rules I have seen at big rendezvouses and shoots is the ramrod needs to be of period materials and fit in the ram rods pipes on your gun. You can get brass ramrods that fit most guns. I used to make out of brass tubing to lessen the weight. The tubing ones stayed in the gun all the time.
 
Ok, tried thinner patch materials normally use .445" ball and .020" patch, for a .465" patch/ball combo. When I do my part, get 1.5" groups at 50yds. Decided 2.5" at 50yds would be acceptable accuracy sacrifice for easier loading. First went to .017" patch for .462" combo with little detectable difference in accuracy or ease of loading. Next tried. 014" patch for .459" combo. Groups went to 2.5", and loading was noticeably easier. Next, went to .440" balls, and .014" patch for .454" combo could seat the ball whith light thumb pressure, but groups opened up to 5". Went to .017" patch for a .457" combo, had to use light pressure on a short starter to seat the ball, but group size was back under 3", next tried. 020" patch for .460" combo, group size was good, but much harder to seat the ball. So, it looks like .457" - .459" is going to be the best compromise.

Reduced the contents of my bag to this:
20241022_144557.jpg


Ordered brass and a nylon replacement rods.
 
Back
Top