Colm Byrne
32 Cal
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2019
- Messages
- 20
- Reaction score
- 15
Hi all just looking for any opinions on this 69 inch matchlock please. All input would be very welcome
Thanks
Thanks
It is roughly 5 kilogrammes in weight.Much agree with Pukka in Post #2. Interesting the small iron reinforcement surrounding the serpentine arm (match holder). Not seen as often.
A question: About how much does the gun weigh ?
Rick
OK. Thanks. That weight makes it about average/common size. They were built in this size , up to wall gun size (See my Thread in this same Forum). As Pukka mentioned, some were built with pan covers, and some not. Here's what it looked like with a pan cover:It is roughly 5 kilogrammes in weight.
I recall the Gunmakers match, its all about barracking & trying to put off the shooter. I don't recall John Bivins actual words but I do recall the pregnant pause just after the shot & some one remarking some thing like "Oh a matchlock Ile go get a coffee and come back to see it fire" " Before I shot . All the books tell us the matchlock was too cumbersome to shoot flying birds probably true enough with a big military musket but not true of a lighter sporting gun such as I made a 12 bore common lock piece used at shows to shoot flying clays even straight up' Over the belt 'ones' Driven' birds.If they're in good condition - shoot 'em - Matchlocks are just plain fun - if you can't get an original get a new build: I have 1570's style built by Rudyard - 44cal - 'Dutch' snapping- style. It's really a whole new experience; the speed of ignition surprises a lot of people - they just go. Shot mine at Pforzheim in 1989 and Rudyard shot it at the Gunmakers match at Friendship on my way home . John Bivins, no less; was heard to remark "Jesus that m***** was quick".
But be careful they can bite - you have a smouldering match around Black Powder they don't need to meet until the right moment.
Thanks for this input, here is a few photos of down barrel, over all the gun is in good condition, have you any tips on how to clean up down the breech?Not used to metric but seems heavy doesn't look too bad ,had a long hard life. Ide leave it ' attic pristine'. What state the bore ?. Like' Pukka' says they are often rough its probably a forged breach end not threaded but there stout and relatively safe just a bother to clean particularly down near the breach as they often have a built-in design anti chamber .
Welcome to the fold of matchlock students. Iv'e been round them 60 years and still don't know the half of it but its fun learning .
Regards Rudyard
Thanks PukkaYou will have noticed no swiveling pan cover Colm.
Some never used one, and the powder was pressed into the bottom of the pan and stuck. Some had roughened pans to help hold the powder in.
Others though, had a cover that slipped on sideways, so it fitted under the pan as well as over. Yours being nice and square cold have been this type.
Just noticed it Does have a kind of unusual rudimentary sideplate.... Id still say a pretty early one though.
Can you give the breech a rub with your thumb, Colm?
I am thinking there may be some koftgari still present.
Enter your email address to join: