warning ...
ff
Snakebite, I agree. With no intent to be disrespectful to Cynthialee, I always bristle at any implication that I have nice things because I'm "privileged," or that others who do not have nice things are "less fortunate," and that my having nice things somehow deprives others.
This kind of rhetoric plays right into the whole LibDem agenda that anyone who has managed to get anywhere in the world has done so because they're 'gaming the system,' or that they have some unfair advantage, or that they're lucky to have a 'rich uncle.'
that is complete :bull:
Well, I got into college because I had good grades and decent board scores, and I got those good grades (and the attendant scores)
because I earned them, ... nobody did my work for me - I wasn't a football jock who got a good grade because the coach interceded on my behalf - I
didn't hang out and drink beer in the parking lot, I
didn't hang out and blow dope behind the gym. There were no "top tier" expensive prep schools: I went to a public high school like everyone else. After class, I went home and studied hard, and when I graduated college and was commissioned I had about thirty five bucks to my name. There was no 'rich uncle.'
Regardless of how my life has turned out, I had an equal opportunity to take advantage of, or to squander, the chances and choices that the path presented.
I have some nice flintlocks because I built them, and I scrimped and saved to buy the parts. I have powder and shot because I
don't have other stuff. Do I have nice rifles? yes. Is my car a rolling PoS? Yes, but that's my call, and I'm not willing to give up having nice rifles for a nice car.
As far as their ownership being a privilege, I disagree. It's a right.
A privilege can be taken away. A right cannot.
ok - that's the tirade for today... i'll get down off my soapbox before I fall and get hurt.