"Isn’t that HC/PC enough? It is for me.'
You could carry a TC Firestorm and they could tell it was a flintlock if they got close enough
How high or low the bar is set for using different guns is up to the individual, whether they are reasonable replicas generic or specific is a matter of fact based on comparing originals and todays offerings, the gun in question could work for post 1800, war of 1812/Alamo by most anyones interpretation of PC/HC, for the Rev War period it would not be PC/HC, there is no PC/HC "enough", something either is or is not for a given item at a given time/place in history.A gun can be "good enough for me" but still not be PC/HC by the accepted standards, this is the "talking a gun into the history books comes into play" once more we are not talking about good and bad here just a degree of commonality with guns of the past to qualify at a certain level of authenticity acceptable to the "communitys" established norms.
Hey Micanopy I hought they may not have a cheekpiece, I had a Navy Arms that was almost the same shape with a 35" barrel that did not have one either, it was a great shooter, I put a .40 GM barrel on it and hunted Deer for several years with it, did the RMFT outfit with it knowing it was a bit small in cal. and not the most common type gun in the Rockies, but it to could pass muster for the post 1800 thing, well I guess I will hand this back to the more knowledgable folks amongst us, maybe we can learn a bit more........
:idunno: