Mike, 45D,
I have no wish to pick a fight with you or anyone else, but you asked in your post above, "Who mentioned smokeless?"
Well it looks to me like you did in post #37 above.
We can get on or not, but I don't think I am out of line thinking you meant smokeless by what you wrote in post #37..
I have quoted your post in full below.
All the best,
Richard.
"
I must admit boys, I am still sitting here wondering why some of you could think that an open top is Stronger, everything else being the same....
I don't normally sit here just wondering, but you have me doing it!
All the best,
Richard.
Should add that though I have a Tranter that I really like, for Plain Looks, and 1851 or 1860 Colt still are some of the best looking revolvers ever!
My sister has an original London Colt.
Click to expand...
To quote you,
"Well, it's hard when you don't understand the design concept. So, I'll try and simplify.
Top strap - I bent a Remington platform loading / shooting lead ball ammo that was ( apparently) too hard. = a weakness in design compared to loading the same ball projectiles in a Dragoon
Open Top - I sheared the loading lever screw on the Dragoon loading the same lead balls. Therefore, the screw was sacrificed, not the frame. = a strong design for the forces applied.
"Another example:
I routinely shoot unmentionable ammo north of 21K psi in my modified Uberti '60 Army. That's roughly 50% more pressure than the top of tier 1 unmentionables. The revolver is in perfect condition. I recently posted a picture of the wedge from that revolver in another thread.
Almost forgot: 95% of these rounds are FMJ, not lead.
Bottom line, a perimeter frame (rectangular structure) surrounding and containing a pressure vessel (cylinder) at discharge is a weaker structure than one half it's size (think of the arbor as the top strap) with more support.
Mike".
all the best,
Richard.