azmntman said:Other than a savings on lead and powder why would one prefer a .36 over a .44 (or .45).??? I must admit I been thinking I need a .36 1851 (and had a 1858 once). But for hunting or protection is a .36 enough whoomph? For range cannot a .44/.45 be acurized as well as a .36?
Just asking, I have no thoughts??
They say there is not an inherent accuracy advantage between the .36 an .44 and when a person spends $1,000 on a pistol, 5 grains of powder is nothing.
There was a slot with the High Master targets at Friendship in September. After the awards I took them to study them.
The top winners are shooting either .32 or .36 in what whatever pistol they shoot.
Most have gone to small calibers as the folks are getting older and they are getting arthritis in their wrist and the small calibers are easier on their wrists. Cost for powder and lead is not the issue.
I read a lot about pistol line shooting and have learned a lot.
I have be come a fan of the .40 in percussion line matches and drifting to the .36 for revolvers.
What I have learned the most about, is how to grip the pistol to make it shoot where you want the ball to go.
At the TMLRA shoot, I was shooting to right consistently. I went to my truck and looked in my range box and there was the answer from a chart in the lid.
Changed my grip and went to 9's and 10's.
Pistols and smooth bore's are the hardest to master.