Round ball verses conical

[coloradoclyde]

To go off-topic even more in my effort to convince everyone I'm not insane,

Epic failure... :haha:

 

[coloradoclyde]

:bow:

 

[Gene L]

Ah, an attempt to make fun of me by not addressing the issue but attacking me personally. And I thought this board was above that sort of thing.

I thought we had a good dialogue going. I made some points and others did as well. There was no ill-will on my side. When others disagreed, some couldn't address the issue and resorted to personal attacks. And that's when they lost.

I'm not going to engage in juvenile attacks; that diminishes those who do. I am sad to say some of you will.

You've lost a little bit of respect. In yourselves, apparently.

 

[necchi]

The score is now;
3 understand
1 does not.

Add me to the list and I think it comes to 5/1 now.
I wish I was good enough at explaining to help here but you guy's have pretty much covered all the basics.

Every rifle I've ever owned, both BP and Smokeless has a sweet spot.

You need to go back to the loading table Gene, every rifle I own has 2 or even 3 "sweet spot's", more so with the CF stuff,
I sure wish I could help you grasp the concept of external ballistics, velocity and rotational spin. :idunno:
You've got yourself pretty limited here,
Good Luck Friend, :wink:

 

[Gene L]

Are you my Friend? (with a smiley face at that!) Friends do not dismiss opinions that differ from theirs. I'm willing to be anyone's friend who does not attempt to ridicule me.

You very well may be a ballistician and give opinions on that subject; I don't know. If so, I wish you'd employ your knowledge to state facts rather than juvenile attacks.

Given your post, I'm not sure I can trust the veracity of further posts any longer without more support of your qualification. And even then, this wasn't one of your best posts. Maybe you will dismiss this post and pass with some comment. Which apparently easier than stating your ballistic point.